PDA

View Full Version : In war... part I


Skjringsaal
08-06-2008, 07:07 AM
Simplily, answer wich do you prefer to kill first. SIf you want, you can aclarate why. Thanks for answering the quiz in its first place.

The situation in which is the question thinked: in war (without considerating the enemies powers for allies),if you could chose wich class would you start killing first, wich do you choose?

Please, just choose one or two options.

misaccc
08-06-2008, 07:10 AM
Warlocks...and conjus

-Paradox-
08-06-2008, 09:18 AM
Anything and everything my hammer comes into contact with. :)

Pizdzius
08-06-2008, 10:40 AM
barbs with swords - before they will kill me in less than 3 seconds with SC

Miraculix
08-06-2008, 01:08 PM
Conjurers first, as long as there is a conjurer around, every bit of mana or health that he gives to the enemies is my mana/health/arrows wasted.

Warlocks come after that, just because I can kill them really fast, and they have the bad habit of letting me know they are there by casting mod/terror on me.

Barbarians come third, because they die fast too, and I hate SC monkeys.


I'm sorry I chose 3, but it's not always the same. Sometimes I'll kill the barbarian first because he is rushing on one of our conjurers, sometime i kill the warlock first because he is rushing with MoD. These are the 3 main targets I search to kill first, so I voted all 3 of them :)

_dracus_
08-06-2008, 01:16 PM
No barbarian don't die fast, I cast last at least 10s in some fort wars when I have the odds with me!

Valorius
08-06-2008, 08:19 PM
Anyone who didn't click conjurer in the poll gets a big fat phail. :)

The only thing more important than a conj is a MoD Warlock so on the assumption those who voted lock meant MoD lock, they get a pass. ;)

Valour
08-06-2008, 08:31 PM
It's all down to circumstances entirely :D

CumeriTarenes
08-06-2008, 08:35 PM
pet's from hunters that try to go after our mages should have a very high priority. Too bad you don't get any reward for killing pets, not even xp.

CumeriTarenes
08-06-2008, 08:36 PM
pet's from hunters that try to go after our mages should have a very high priority. Too bad you don't get any reward for killing pets, not even xp.


but usually I go for mages first, also barbs that rush in because barbs are dieying quite fast and kill quite fast.

Valorius
08-06-2008, 08:42 PM
Most people seem to agree, as pets do not last long at all in fort wars or large mobile battles. Often every pet on both sides is dead within 10 seconds of the armies loosing their initial barrages.

Skjringsaal
08-06-2008, 08:59 PM
I sould ask wich is easier for killing.

sathilda
08-06-2008, 09:03 PM
Mages first indeed, even if Valorious can make me override this rule, as the Ignis MOTD says it :angel1:

Valorius
08-06-2008, 09:16 PM
LOL! I'm in the Ignis MOTD?!??! :theking:

Haha, if only it were true. That would be the highest compliment.

Angelwinged_Devil
08-06-2008, 09:21 PM
it depends on the situation, if a knight is there with deflecting barrier it would be a good idea to kill him and damage the whole group

if there's a lock I'd kill him fast if I got him into range but a conjurer would be my main priority over a warlock if the warlock isn't modded I would just dizzy the warlock first

a barbarian rushing to our army would almost give me a bigger priority as he can kill a conjurer very quickly if done right and no one notices him (seen before.)

The same for a marksman but he's last because of all the damn evasion, he's not that fatal as a knight with deflecting though.

Hunters? Just poke em' till they run away XD

GIGO305
08-06-2008, 09:59 PM
first ting is firts :metal: WARJUUUUUU ...but we are not conjus :/, and yea dont tink of me im always targeted :P


ok i got for warlocks first to protectcr zarky and so he can go get his revenge also im killing the crowd control, then marks cus they got super range and are a pain after that barbs before they rush in and i can kill the fast.

but i rlly dnt have preferences i go for anything.... :sifflote: (excluding names)