Ubuntu 9.10 - Windows 7 (Benchmark)

Innopeor · 02-18-2010, 06:39 PM

Hi all,
i did some tests in order to know which OS/libraries have a better support for RO.

My hardware:
CPU: Intel Pentium E5300
GC: NVidia GeForce 9500GT 512MB
Mainboard: ASUSTeK (P5G41-M LX)
Ram: 3GB

Advanced options:
Anisotropic Filter: 1x
Antialiasing Filter: 2x
Texture Quality: High
HW Skinning: Checked
Terrain Multitexturing: High
Terrain Details: Unchecked
Object View Distance: Very High
Water Quality: High
Local Lighting: Checked
Shadows: Checked
Shadows Distance: Medium
Shadows Quality: High
Post Processes: Max
Particle/Weather FXs: Checked

====================
Windows 7 Ultimate (64bit)
====================
http://img294.imageshack.us/img294/2649/14576774.jpg

NVidia drivers: 196.34 Beta
Average FPS: 100
Renderizer: Direct3D (Vista Mode)

====================
Kubuntu Karmic (x86-64)
====================
http://img18.imageshack.us/img18/521/49638256.jpg

NVidia drivers: 190.53 Certified
Average FPS: 70
Renderizer: OpenGL

Myxir · 02-19-2010, 09:56 AM

Nah, I think this "benchmark" would just have some sort of meaning if you use the same renderizer on both systems. OpenGL and windows would be interesting.

Znurre · 02-19-2010, 10:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Myxir

Nah, I think this "benchmark" would just have some sort of meaning if you use the same renderizer on both systems. OpenGL and windows would be interesting.

Agreed, I was just about to post that myself.
EDIT: And what shader model are you using in the both tests?

Innopeor · 02-19-2010, 02:58 PM

Hi,
ok this time i did the same tests with OpenGL as renderizer on both OS.

====================
Windows 7 Ultimate (64bit)
====================

NVidia drivers: 196.34 Beta
Average FPS: 75-77
Renderizer: OpenGL
Shader model: 3.0

====================
Kubuntu Karmic (x86-64)
====================

NVidia drivers: 195.30 Beta (Updated yesterday)
Average FPS: 70-74
Renderizer: OpenGL
Shader model: 3.0

Znurre · 02-19-2010, 03:03 PM

That's pretty equal.
The Shader model 3.0 is acting really weird though from my experience.
I get better FPS with 4.0 than with 3.0, and much better graphics.

Another thing that would be nice to test is the FPS on other distros with the same hardware, to see how much that affects performance.

Myxir · 02-19-2010, 04:12 PM

Nice. It's almost equal though

Innopeor · 02-19-2010, 05:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Znurre

Another thing that would be nice to test is the FPS on other distros with the same hardware, to see how much that affects performance.

Just tried on Fedora 12 and well, still a significative increase of fps equal to 10-15 more than Ubuntu 9.10.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Znurre

I get better FPS with 4.0 than with 3.0, and much better graphics.

About graphics images speak for themselves, i wont start an API's war, but personally i think RO under D3D is best in quality and prestations.

=======
OpenGL
=======
http://img502.imageshack.us/img502/3...0021914522.jpg

=======
Direct3D
=======
http://img704.imageshack.us/img704/5...0021914510.jpg

02-18-2010, 06:39 PM	#1
Innopeor Pledge Join Date: Aug 2009 Posts: 15	Ubuntu 9.10 - Windows 7 (Benchmark) Hi all, i did some tests in order to know which OS/libraries have a better support for RO. My hardware: CPU: Intel Pentium E5300 GC: NVidia GeForce 9500GT 512MB Mainboard: ASUSTeK (P5G41-M LX) Ram: 3GB Advanced options: Anisotropic Filter: 1x Antialiasing Filter: 2x Texture Quality: High HW Skinning: Checked Terrain Multitexturing: High Terrain Details: Unchecked Object View Distance: Very High Water Quality: High Local Lighting: Checked Shadows: Checked Shadows Distance: Medium Shadows Quality: High Post Processes: Max Particle/Weather FXs: Checked ==================== Windows 7 Ultimate (64bit) ==================== http://img294.imageshack.us/img294/2649/14576774.jpg NVidia drivers: 196.34 Beta Average FPS: 100 Renderizer: Direct3D (Vista Mode) ==================== Kubuntu Karmic (x86-64) ==================== http://img18.imageshack.us/img18/521/49638256.jpg NVidia drivers: 190.53 Certified Average FPS: 70 Renderizer: OpenGL

02-19-2010, 09:56 AM	#2
Myxir Count Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Germany Posts: 1,164	Nah, I think this "benchmark" would just have some sort of meaning if you use the same renderizer on both systems. OpenGL and windows would be interesting. __________________ French Warriors of Syrtis: Nessa Telrunya (Hunter) - Myxir (Warlock) - Estra (Conjurer) In War it does not matter who is right, but who is left.

02-19-2010, 03:03 PM	#5
Znurre Marquis Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: RA Posts: 1,897	That's pretty equal. The Shader model 3.0 is acting really weird though from my experience. I get better FPS with 4.0 than with 3.0, and much better graphics. Another thing that would be nice to test is the FPS on other distros with the same hardware, to see how much that affects performance. __________________ Winning a fight is not what makes you a good player, it's how you do it. http://home.znur.re/screenshot%20201...2011_39_37.jpg

02-19-2010, 04:12 PM	#6
Myxir Count Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Germany Posts: 1,164	Nice. It's almost equal though __________________ French Warriors of Syrtis: Nessa Telrunya (Hunter) - Myxir (Warlock) - Estra (Conjurer) In War it does not matter who is right, but who is left.

02-19-2010, 02:58 PM	#4
Innopeor Pledge Join Date: Aug 2009 Posts: 15	Hi, ok this time i did the same tests with OpenGL as renderizer on both OS. ==================== Windows 7 Ultimate (64bit) ==================== NVidia drivers: 196.34 Beta Average FPS: 75-77 Renderizer: OpenGL Shader model: 3.0 ==================== Kubuntu Karmic (x86-64) ==================== NVidia drivers: 195.30 Beta (Updated yesterday) Average FPS: 70-74 Renderizer: OpenGL Shader model: 3.0