|
|
The Inn A place to gather around and chat about almost any subject |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
04-17-2010, 09:54 AM | #1 |
Apprentice
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 55
|
Mind Squasher problem
ok we all Know whats the problem with Mind Squasher
i works always or never and ist not fair that some ppl heve a 100% whit it and some 25% or 0% so here is my suggestion make ms a 100% success spell but only for one radom buff and increase cd to 25 i think its better to have a 100% chance debuff one spell then 75% to fail and lose 200 mana and pls dont say things like: "if ms gone by changed warriors will go for swords" thats not true blunt tree has far more to offer then just ms Crushing Strong blow that breaks bones. Type: Constant Duration: 30.0 secs Cost: 206 mana Cooldown: 60.0 secs Attack damage +100% Constitution -15 Jaw Breaker A blow to the jaw makes the opponent dizzy. Type: Constant Duration: 15.0 secs Cost: 320 mana Cooldown: 25.0 secs Casting: 1.0 secs Attack damage +100% Dizzy Thunder Strike The warrior strikes the floor with his weapon, making it tremble and affecting the surrounding area. Type: Constant Duration: 12.0 secs Area: 6.0 Cost: 500 mana Cooldown: 180.0 secs Casting: 2.5 secs Stun Weapon damage +100% + blut weapons do the most normal dam especaly if you play barbar |
04-17-2010, 10:07 AM | #2 |
Apprentice
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Vilnius, Lithuania
Posts: 66
|
The other skills are too expensive and their effect isn't as good as the MS one
__________________
ltl Conjurador , Eilux Kulh Cazador
Shinigami's Origin |
04-17-2010, 10:59 AM | #3 |
Marquis
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: England
Posts: 2,419
|
Crushing is decent but not all that great
Jaw breaker costs far to much and has casting time Thunderstrike isnt as good as Typhoon (slashing area) Other than MS, slash tree's powers are better in pretty much every way. Although blunt hits tend to be higher than slashing hits they also tend to be slower and Beast attack (the only %% attack for blunt users ;_; ) Is more costly, generaly lower hitting, and with a far longer CD, than South Cross, as well as being in a whole other tree. MS is fine as it is. When you use it you flip a coin on 200 mana, sure you get +100% wep damage anyway but thats almost always less than a normal hit for whatever reasons ... yesterday my MS worked I think once in 7 trys, and a level 3 MS worked on me, somedays MS works nearly every time, I still think its fine.
__________________
Faith 50 Barb Faithless 50 Lock
Umaril 45 Conju Kailas 45 Marks Pel 45 Knight Last edited by Umaril; 04-17-2010 at 11:13 AM. |
04-17-2010, 12:18 PM | #4 | |
Marquis
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,439
|
Quote:
Also, I have a better idea. Why don't NGD just fix the damn spell? |
|
04-17-2010, 12:30 PM | #5 |
Baron
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 714
|
MS is fine
though i personally think MS should be popped into the tactics tree Blunt Users just tend to Spam MS - buffed or unbuffed
__________________
Ramsli Klutu
|
04-17-2010, 01:25 PM | #6 |
Marquis
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: England
Posts: 2,419
|
Blunters Spam MS, Slashers spam SC If nothing else it shows our lack of other spells worth using ^^
Anyway, someone needs to deal with Ao1, SS, Over-buffed barbs etc. And since most knights use warlord axes nowadays it seems to fall to barbs to do it more often than not
__________________
Faith 50 Barb Faithless 50 Lock
Umaril 45 Conju Kailas 45 Marks Pel 45 Knight |
04-17-2010, 01:51 PM | #7 | |
Baron
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 714
|
Quote:
__________________
Ramsli Klutu
|
|
04-17-2010, 02:02 PM | #8 | |
Apprentice
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 55
|
Quote:
and Barbars ARE ment to do super dam if a babar is uneble to kill a knight befor he casts ao1 its his problem barbar have enough tools to do that pls no more reasons for babars to use tatcticks |
|
04-17-2010, 02:12 PM | #9 |
Baron
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 714
|
why?
more a barb uses tactics the less damage he does meaning good news for you
__________________
Ramsli Klutu
|
04-17-2010, 02:16 PM | #10 | |
Marquis
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: England
Posts: 2,419
|
Quote:
I do win vs knights one to one more often than not, simply because its easier for a barb to kill a knight than a knight to kill a barb, the knight must land a lot more hits.
__________________
Faith 50 Barb Faithless 50 Lock
Umaril 45 Conju Kailas 45 Marks Pel 45 Knight |
|
|
|