|
|
General discussion Topics related to various aspects of Champions of Regnum |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
07-19-2011, 12:05 AM | #1 |
NGD·Studios
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 892
|
balance Update 2011 Stage 1 - Summary
Please post the summary of the Stage 1 innitial discussion here.
Post# 2 should be the summary. Post #3 and beyond should be comments of things that where ommited by mistake or whatever reason. (I hope the one who helps making the summary will update post #2) try to keep it as short as possible and add links to posts if needed Proposed format: Warriors NGD Change 1: swap feint for intimidate Oppinion 1: this change is ok. Oppinion 2: intimidate for barbarians is too much because they are already one of the fastest classes (LINK) .... Oppinion n:... Community change 2: ......... IDEM Etc. thanks a lot for your help guys! Last edited by chilko; 07-19-2011 at 02:42 AM. |
07-19-2011, 02:45 AM | #2 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 342
|
Well Ill be the one who breaks the Ice... I dont really understand what you are asking from us XD
|
07-19-2011, 03:36 AM | #3 |
Count
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Bavaria
Posts: 1,026
|
I think I know. A bit.
- means -, and + means + :P ....starts a line related to the previous one, an opinion about another player's opinion. NGD changes: Feint <-> Intimidate swap: Brainless agrees: 10 +Barb with 2 knocks is too much. -one reason less to use spears (feint range) (4) -a slow still makes barbarians quite strong, especially combined with spring, or UM (7) ("a slow down spell for the fastest class") ....+barbarians won't use intimidate (2), points are better invested elsewhere, those 10% aren't enough to make this spell OP (No clear line here, everyone disagrees with everyone) -spring + UM + kick = still too strong, kick needs a nerf as well -all classes have the ability to kill others without taking much damage, so why not barbs? -move kick instead of feint because kick is stronger (and ignores attack cycle), and to encourage barbarians to use spears (2) Burst of wind blocked by DI: Brainless agrees: 10 Two posts agree only if DI gets modified. They did not say how. 2 posts wants BoW to remain as is. -DI (and confuse) become(s) more OP (4) (Another power to be blocked by them) -needs more nerfs, 11 seconds dizzy + this range is too much, 3 posts asking for shorter dizzy duration .....Another suggestion: more casting time for it, one reason BoW is imbalanced is the speed it can be cast at Marksman mana regeneration change: -Concerns about lack of mana (4) +It's possible right now to use recharged arrows without thinking about mana. Melee-ambush: -Concerns about further weakening of hunters (6) -Too many melee knock downs +Stops ambush spamming -Melee-knock down spam festival, just luck decides who will win (...) -warriors ruling fort wars then, no archer-CC-protection for mages -even less options to stop barbarians (3) -too much risk, rather 15m range (4) -Ranged classes that can't knock down from range are ridiculous stun fist: -There already is a (ranged) stun spell (3) -warriors ruling fort wars then, no archer-CC-protection for mages -even less options to stop barbarians (3) will domain => slow: Brainless disagrees: 2 -warlocks need a ranged knock down as a resist counter -too many slows for warlocks, slows becoming OP (5) needs to be significant to replace will domain -will domain is one of the fast spells able to disrupt CC chains and hence needed -weakening mages even more (2) -mages need a knock -Looks just like a warlock spell from Arcania -more problems for knights (2) -Nobody dies in 8 seconds from a lock, so a knock down for locks isn't overpowered. changes in general: -removing options (...) -too slow steps, radical changes are needed to fix conceptual problems; Balance updates now shouldn't be about overpowered and underpowered classes. Some conceptual problems: shared tree disease, too long CC durations, no role/definition of hunters, same spell damage for level 40 and level 60s. Community changes: ambush => hunter only (5) 2 posts suggest removing camouflage corpse. Fix conceptual problems first (...) combat triangle (mages>warriors>archers>mages), just archers need more tools to kill mages (...) Wild spirit boost CC protection buff for warlocks more CC protection buffs in general Archer range reduction more speed for knights, too many slows against them .....not needed, CC nerfs increase knights' mobility marksmen: nerf/remove strategic position (4) .....that would make marksman a second hunter nerf winter stroke: More cool down is popular (9) CD offered are 25 (1) and 40 sec(3). Remove damage bonus on winter stoke (1 post). .....Do not touch winter stroke (1) Restore the old range (1) burst of wind range reduction NGD changes do nothing about freeze spam, Confuse, Caltrops/Lightning arrow Marksmen are too dependent on items knock downs: No knock downs at all for barbarians as their role is damage knockdowns last too long/should be max 4 seconds (11!!!) CCs shouldn't "mark your grave", they should be tactical additions, not the center of the game, one knock down can mean a "onehit" and decides the outcome of most fights, making many other tactics useless. Other tactics/spells aren't needed, just knock downs, knock downs are: An immobilize A 100% debuff of evade, resist, block, (miss) A cannot attack A cancel attack Barbarians just need one knock down to kill (2) A game with that many players can't have spells with that long durations, change knock downs like unstoppable madness and army of one (...) suggestion: chance to break CC when a number of damages is received (2) suggestion: more counters against them, e.g. buffs suggestion: Make them just work on moving targets to prevent chains and stacking in an very elegant way. Knock downs not working on knocked down players isn't really elegant. confuse nerf (5) solution for 2 second knocks not scaling very well from level 1 to 5: Some spells may have less levels. "no need to force yourself to come up with 5 different effects/spell levels if it doesn't come naturally" (...) Solution for too strong items (and other stuff): no absolute armor reduction, in a normal percent system 20% more damage is just 20% more, and not 100% more. (e.g.: 400 damage and 480 damage, 20% more, but with 320 points absolute reduction it's 80 damage vs 160 damage, 100% more) A definition of hunters, something individual differing them from marksmen, like high range vs. low range. Got tired of counting somewhere on page 7. Create polls if you want numbers. :P Numbers and additions from bois included. Ps: Long live insomnia! This dull work for sure helps to sleep though, lol
__________________
Last edited by Seher; 07-20-2011 at 12:24 PM. |
07-19-2011, 05:23 AM | #4 | |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 342
|
Quote:
|
|
07-19-2011, 05:57 AM | #5 |
Initiate
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 205
|
What I see in this is that you are unsure how to fix your game and looking for any help you can get. Most of the community suggestions are biased from shitty players. >.>
|
07-19-2011, 08:03 AM | #6 |
Master
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Straya cunt!
Posts: 251
|
No, they're just asking us for our opinion so they dont get lots of retarded forumers who dont play the actual game spamming up the forums with how their changes are bad and how a class is op and blahblahblah.
|
07-19-2011, 08:18 AM | #7 |
Initiate
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 111
|
"Brainless Agrees/Disagrees". Lolz
|
07-19-2011, 09:12 AM | #8 | ||
Baron
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Portugal
Posts: 940
|
I am totally confused with this...
Anyway, every single CC needs to be shortened. Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Daar |
||
07-19-2011, 09:55 AM | #9 |
Pledge
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 20
|
Barbarians resistance is nothing compared to knights 100% resistance, when anything you can expect from attacking knight is block. I would say nerf knights resistance.
|
07-19-2011, 10:05 AM | #10 |
Baron
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Portugal
Posts: 940
|
No, those are knights abusing the Precise Block animations bugs, they hide the animation and get a 6 second 100% block chance.
__________________
Daar |
|
|