ok lol!
this i just had to point out....hunters are one of the easiest classes to play 1on1(open field)...i mean cmon...when i played a lvl46 hunter for the first time in the war zone i killed a lvl50 knight and a barb....im guessing conjus would be easy ass hell with tricks(didnt use them tho)...and when i got pwned by a lvl50 lock i just sotw and camo behind a rock...That was my first time i played a hunter and i killed 2 lvl50 warriors!dude....

This doesn't mean that hunter is a stronger class - just that the people u fought didn't know how to fight hunters.

Use that hunter again and go find someome like Inkster or Znurre- see how strong you feel with hunter then...

he played with a hunter for the first time and won?

There are many who are lvl 50 that I could probably beat with a lvl 10 hunter :D But seriously, just because your lvl 50 doesn't make you uber.

i just had to comment about tari's post where he said hunters require much skill to be played...my point they can quite easily kill both melee classes when a pt like me can kill 2 lvl50 warriors...its not about who knows how to fight who when you cant catch the enemy...what should i do play dead?

I agree with that... the "no mana, no win" fact takes even more sense when we speak about hunters...

As a lock, if they do the big error to not confuse you meteor/silence + Mana burn + energy borrow + darkness is already a pain in hunters' ass because they can't run away. Indeed all of that is theory, but i've experienced that case yesterday and today with 4 lvl 50 hunters + pets.

Killing them with lvl 4 warlock spells and 14 levels less than them shows who are overpowered...

Means nothing - first fight with my barb against a same lvl hunter i won...

We can all name instances when this or that happened - it proves nothing in the main...

This means that you need to be so fucking damn good to beat a hunter and noob tactics to beat other classes?

So it means I play a barb and cannot beat a hunter despite of evades, resists and lag, it means I am uber dumb and stupid that my IQ is below negative

Get real.

I wasn't sure if this was worth replying to - more of a rant than an argument - as usual..

Anyway, my point is simply that hunters can be beat - you just have to learn how.

As a hunter, i used to have problems against warlocks - i couldn't beat them. But i learned how and now i win most times.

And what you say about not being able to beat hunters because of lag: do you lag worse with hunters more than other classes?

I think not...

This just goes to show how desperate the 'hunters are overpowered' brigade are to try and convince you of their cause.

Barbs can't win hunters beacuse of lag - ha ha!!....

And talking of resists - my healer at lvl 42 resists a lot more than my hunter...

A barb can easily and I mean easily kill a hunter one on one if they know what they are doing. This hunter hype is starting to make me sick.