|
|
Questions to the Community Guides and how-to play threads posted by other users |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
04-18-2010, 12:49 PM | #1 |
Initiate
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Peterborough, Ontario
Posts: 189
|
A Question About SotW (Not a Rant, An Honest Question)
Again, I'm not a beginner, but this area is labeled 'Questions', so here goes...
A couple of days ago (sorry, don't remember which day), I was on my warlock, running towards Samal, and a hunter popped up, and went into SotW (sorry, I don't remember which hunter). I had just woken up, and wasn't paying attension at first, so I cast Ivy on the hunter. It landed. I ended up dead, in part due to my surprise over Ivy having worked. Given SotW's high resistance rate (I didn't look up the number, but I'm pretty sure it's a big number), is this a bug, or just a numbers fluke? Nothing else I have ever casted on a SotW'd hunter has ever worked, so I'm curious what's up with this. Thanks in advance.
__________________
o Q o (WM), Martok (WM), Wyatt Earp (53), T'Pol (52), P'Tak (57), Rotarrin (38)
|
04-18-2010, 12:55 PM | #2 |
Marquis
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 2,076
|
It is just luck.
__________________
Dky Sven, level 54 knight (Ra) Valhalla Dky the Goat, level 35 conjurer(Ra) Dky Sven, level 51 knight(Horus) Something |
04-18-2010, 12:59 PM | #3 |
Initiate
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Peterborough, Ontario
Posts: 189
|
OK, well, that's that, then. Thanks.
__________________
o Q o (WM), Martok (WM), Wyatt Earp (53), T'Pol (52), P'Tak (57), Rotarrin (38)
|
04-18-2010, 02:26 PM | #4 |
Marquis
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: England
Posts: 2,419
|
I once managed to land MS (and it worked ^^) thorugh sotw, bet the hunter was quite suprised
Its very good protection vs spells, but it still has a small fail chance.
__________________
Faith 50 Barb Faithless 50 Lock
Umaril 45 Conju Kailas 45 Marks Pel 45 Knight |
04-18-2010, 02:38 PM | #5 |
Count
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: England, UK.
Posts: 1,055
|
__________________
MattdoesJOKE_#40_NOT_FOUND
RA / Hor... Haven? |
04-18-2010, 03:34 PM | #6 | |
Initiate
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Peterborough, Ontario
Posts: 189
|
Quote:
__________________
o Q o (WM), Martok (WM), Wyatt Earp (53), T'Pol (52), P'Tak (57), Rotarrin (38)
|
|
04-18-2010, 03:53 PM | #7 |
Baron
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Berlin, Germany
Posts: 715
|
The old sotw was like a god mode, you evaded everything, spells and autohits.
|
04-18-2010, 04:31 PM | #8 |
Count
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: England, UK.
Posts: 1,055
|
Yeah, like doppel said it evaded EVERYTHING.
It's was +90% evade at level 5 (IIRC) [also back then spells could be evaded and resisted] and getting _anything_ through it was like "HELL YEAH!!" whereas now it's "lol, I got xyz through sotw."
__________________
MattdoesJOKE_#40_NOT_FOUND
RA / Hor... Haven? |
04-18-2010, 05:11 PM | #9 |
Initiate
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Peterborough, Ontario
Posts: 189
|
Yikes. Was there a lot of complaints about it like there is now?
When my conjurer was in the low 40's, fatigue was done away with, just so you know. When I started, Invasions were already in place I think. When I hear the older players talking about the differences than and now, it makes me wish I had started sooner.
__________________
o Q o (WM), Martok (WM), Wyatt Earp (53), T'Pol (52), P'Tak (57), Rotarrin (38)
|
04-18-2010, 05:38 PM | #10 | |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Cheshire, England
Posts: 219
|
Quote:
|
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|