[POLL] What vg_fov value you prefer

[71175]

Originally Posted by ieti

Just see what are most used vg_fov distances from the polls. Increase max zoom level to this distance.
Everyone happy.

Most popular is less than 100 i need more than 110. Not everyone

[Ashnurazg]

[translated]The fact that you could modify a configuration file and get a slight advantage is a mistake that was corrected.

A mistake, seriously? That's a great feature, not a mistake!
Regnum has greater problems with "advantages" than the fov.
It's a slight advantage, but not that enormous advantage.

[exaggeration]
For example equipment and equipment improvements that have been bought with Xim is a enormous advantage. Consequently remove all that stuff!
[/exaggeration]

Hey, guys reenable to change the field of view in the next hotfix, 45 is too less!

I play nearly for 2 years (included some long pauses) with fov 60.
With fov 45 Regnum is not a game for what I will buy Xim!

PS: It's not in the changelog, shame on you, NGD. Ask the community before changing it.

[Eyfura]

Generally RO client customization is very poor compared to other mmo's I have played and now you limiting it even more. This is no way to go, instead you should make client more customizable.
Hope for once you would listen to customers, afterall, they pay your salary

[lunedor]

I nearly play regnum for 4 years, and have never modified or even searched to modify any parameter in any configuration file of this game, and it's playeable as it .

I let people who want to get a hidden advantage on others with their consciousness.

The observation of such people is probably the most important reason that keeps me playing RO, and this thread gives more information than any treatise of psychology

[ieti]

I do not feel guilty in any way.

I do not think i cheated. It is just for the sake to play more comfortable and to be more effective and fun.

RO needs more improvements than restrictions.

[Zodar]

I'm sure a previous version (2 years+ ago?) of RO had a higher vg_fov setting, that was reduced for some reason. This was probably why people started messing with it in the first place.

[Seher]

What about people playing with more than one monitor? Fov 45 with 3 monitors arranged 180° around you? Sure…

[Ashnurazg]

Originally Posted by ieti

I do not feel guilty in any way.

I do not think i cheated. It is just for the sake to play more comfortable and to be more effective and fun.

RO needs more improvements than restrictions.

+1

For me as a computer science student it's normal to look into the config files and manipulate it, try different things out to get a better gameplay.

[Zas_]

Removing this option from game is a bad move, the feature exists (configurable FOV), don't remove it, instead allow the player to set FOV in Options / Video via a slider, defined min and max values (ie. 40-80), fixed.

/reset_powers is somehow hacky too (new players don't know about this command, and often learn it very late), a fix for that was proposed a long time ago, just allow plus/minus to work anytime in Training dialog (with Cancel button), no need for this obscure and mandatory command.

[Jack_Dragonkiller]

I used vg_fov 65 before version 1.9.6. But I don't feel any gameplay-diference between vg_fov 45 and 65. The game is playable for me either way.
My screen resolution is 1680x1000 and I play the game at ultra settings.