|
|
General discussion Topics related to various aspects of Champions of Regnum |
View Poll Results: Account-bound gear for transferred characters, Haven to Ra. How do you feel about it? | |||
I'm okay with an account-bound restriction on transfer. | 35 | 47.95% | |
I'm okay with an account-bound restriction, except I'd like to sell gear to merchants. | 4 | 5.48% | |
I'd be okay with it if we make the restriction only for epic-level gear and above. | 2 | 2.74% | |
I'd be okay with it if we make the restriction only for boss gear. | 13 | 17.81% | |
I've already got toons on Ra, so I don't care about restrictions on gear after transfer. | 10 | 13.70% | |
Hell, no! If NGD does this, I'm never playing this game again. | 9 | 12.33% | |
No. I will not transfer my character under those conditions. | 19 | 26.03% | |
I don't care what NGD does. I left this game a long time ago and I'm never coming back. | 3 | 4.11% | |
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 73. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
10-26-2018, 06:35 AM | #91 |
Apprentice
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 63
|
Pretty sure that it was already mentioned and emphasized a lot in almost all previous threads related to this topic.
Without that that it possibly might not have even seem as a possible problem at all. |
10-26-2018, 07:09 AM | #92 | |
Master
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Kogoruhn
Posts: 319
|
Quote:
Could you please stop fabulating? They made crystal clear what's the reason of locking items to account.
__________________
A better world. |
|
10-26-2018, 08:05 AM | #93 | |
Apprentice
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 63
|
Quote:
Not saying that it should't be done or there would be no reasons for it, but ... It Wasn't considered necessary in any previous server merges/transfers, and all im saying is that it might have been the same with this time unless some players emphasized it as ''some kind of critical and huge problem" even though the number of players left waiting for the transfer is probably insignificant next to what Ra server has online on daily basis. Its possible that we all are making an elephant out of a fly with this specific problem. |
|
10-28-2018, 04:35 PM | #94 |
Pledge
Join Date: Sep 2018
Posts: 27
|
Now that the poll has closed --
I posted this poll to help everyone, including NGD, get a feel for how the forum community felt about the idea. Thanks for keeping the discussion civil and relatively on-topic. As you can see, the poll results are mixed. We know that some people with multiple accounts voted multiple times. Respondents were self-selecting. Any poll conducted by email would have the same issues. We have 95 answers from 73 people (checking multiple boxes was allowed). Only 19 of 73 said they would not transfer under an account-bound condition. 9 said they'd quit. Because multiple responses per respondent were allowed, there's no way of knowing how many of the 19 were part of the 9 or vice versa. 64 of 95 responses indicated "okay with it" in one form or another, and only 28 indicated they weren't. 3, of course, don't care (but they answered the poll, so they must care enough to say something). It is possible that some people checked opposing viewpoints within their response, just to muck with the results. In the discussion, it seems most people who post are okay with the idea of certain items remaining account-bound (reflecting the poll results). The idea that certain pieces of gear should be account-bound doesn't seem to generate a lot of angst. Many people think it's unfair, but many also acknowledge the irregularities in the way some gear was acquired by certain players on Raven/Haven/Horus/others. Most want NGD to make a decision and implement it soon. Yet NGD says they want to get it right, to make sure transferring players are treated fairly (which is important, because unhappy players make for bad press and poor reputation), but also to limit the damage transfers could cause to the internal economy of the game, because that would cause other players to quit. In conclusion: it appears the majority of the community would go with it, and some players would leave. |
10-29-2018, 02:57 PM | #95 |
Initiate
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 108
|
It's not like we didn't know the results apriori. I mean, even Adrian knows that if tranfers was to happen right now, most players would stay. What I applaud is him taking the time to think the right way to do this action. It is just a matter of time.
Kind regards. |
11-13-2018, 04:33 PM | #96 |
Pledge
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 1
|
Maybe
I've been with Regnum through 3 servers Ra horus and haven, haven is just a dead server that didn't even have enough players to formally have a good fort fight, I would hate to say good bye to some friends but he'll transfer me to any other server that Valhalla looks promising, could care less about account bound items if they are in the way just deleted them or make a bank toon, I just want war and after taking a 3 year break from this game, and coming back to this dead server its honestly heart breaking. Dilligaf
|
11-18-2018, 11:05 PM | #97 |
Pledge
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Usa
Posts: 27
|
Any news? People are getting angry
|
11-19-2018, 04:08 PM | #98 | ||
Master
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Kogoruhn
Posts: 319
|
Quote:
Quote:
There will be enough time after Xmas to ragequit if they ditch this.
__________________
A better world. |
||
11-20-2018, 03:13 AM | #99 | |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: 'B-F-Egypt', Virginia, U.S.A. (please pity & forgive us poor american fools!).
Posts: 605
|
Quote:
|
|
11-21-2018, 08:06 AM | #100 |
Apprentice
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 63
|
I am very surprised to say this, but for once i completely agree with Lebeau on this one.
|
|
|