06-16-2008, 04:27 PM | #11 | |
Count
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: France
Posts: 1,416
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
06-16-2008, 04:36 PM | #12 |
Count
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,186
|
that would force order of casting
seriously, i can hit and hit and hit conju while he is under steel skin, and if he even has zarkit, what a joy. There is nothing wrong, only wrong thing is that you count a lot on your allies to protect you of "mad" archer. But that was your choice so dont whine
__________________
Inquisition |
06-16-2008, 06:58 PM | #13 | |
Master
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 322
|
Quote:
Also sotw/confuse is really cheap...
__________________
Valour Mutiny Wra Nohadon Thirteen Valourious |
|
06-16-2008, 06:59 PM | #14 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,145
|
Quote:
You can even test who has DI and who not. The cheap spell is confuse not the combos XD. |
|
06-16-2008, 07:05 PM | #15 |
Master
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 322
|
Hmm, but combos make it possible to do extremely easily.
Even if confuse was nerfed to 0 range like some people say, hunters and marksman in sotw could still do it with ease.
__________________
Valour Mutiny Wra Nohadon Thirteen Valourious |
06-16-2008, 07:14 PM | #16 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,145
|
Quote:
The cheap thing about confuse is the duration, when you can make a pj defensless with 1 skill its simply logic to make that spell has few duration. Confuse is 40 secs in lvl 5. Lot of times i see two leveling, 1 of them is conjurer. You go out of camou with full mana, confuse the conjurer and you are in a 1vs1 with the other one. If the duration was less then there is no problem, if you dont kill the other one fast you are doomed. With the duration of the current confuse i can kill a warlock with only normal attacks and pet and the conjurer is still confused. Its just so cheap. |
|
06-16-2008, 07:15 PM | #17 | |
Count
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Arse firmly glued to Ra
Posts: 1,042
|
Quote:
hmm i think you have completely missed the point. Let me put it another way, imagine im a marks jogging merrily along. I see a warrior 'ooo scary' So i cast in this order 1. SOTW. 2. DS on the warrior I am now untouchable but for a good few seconds i can base attack and kill pretty much everything.
__________________
Follow me on facebook https://www.facebook.com/lomgom/
|
|
06-16-2008, 08:40 PM | #18 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 890
|
I think SofW should be 100% evasion but remove all buffs from the archer.
I.e. a fully buffed archer would have to use other options first and think twice about simply casting SofW because its the easiest way. It would still be awesome spell, since it would keep you safe quickly and still allow support conjurers to give you the heals and mana you need to keep going. It should definitely not be possible to use camo under SofW simple because it ruin risk v reward, it enables hunters to attack a weak player among alot of strong players, only to disappear into thin air after mission is accomplished. |
06-16-2008, 09:44 PM | #19 | |
Initiate
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Gone, Part time.. ETA? Unsure :(
Posts: 192
|
Quote:
Its a little cheap but if thats what you have to do... then so be it. |
|
06-16-2008, 09:48 PM | #20 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,994
|
Quote:
It's the entire evasion tree. Marksmen need to be divorced from that tree, that's all there is to it. |
|
|
|