|
|
|||||||
| Questions to the Community Guides and how-to play threads posted by other users |
| View Poll Results: Am i right or wrong in assuming this? | |||
| Right |
   
|
10 | 55.56% |
| Wrong |
  
|
6 | 33.33% |
| Some good points |
  
|
8 | 44.44% |
| Some bad points... |
  
|
5 | 27.78% |
| Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 18. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
08-27-2011, 02:14 AM
|
#1 |
|
Initiate
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: The United kingdom
Posts: 191
 |
Offensive V Defensive/Support
(The Poll is multiple choice)
(Main Question) Offensive Classes Barbarian Marksmen Warlock Defensive/Support Classes Knight Hunter Conjurer The offensive class should have little armor/defensive buffs and mainly be focused on attack getting assistance on defensive and support from the defensive/support classes... Knights Buffing Defence + Assisting during fights, Conjurers Healing + Assistingduring fights, Hunters Scouting + Assisting during fights. Saying this am i right in making the assumption that the barbarian may have too much defence (or not enough defence reduction with self buffs) and a marksmen shouldn't have more defence than a hunter? (side Question) Ok with a barbarian i am a little confused with sticking into offensive because they have ok/good armor and deal amazing damage but they can also buff their teamates damage and have the ability to assist in speed. Should the offensive classes also have buffs to also assist or is this too much? Also a Warlock has the ability to buff up teamates and assist in mana, isnt this too much?
__________________
It's all about the money, because money makes the world go round, and round the bend, who knows when all this crazy sh*t will end. Last edited by SPARTISH; 08-27-2011 at 06:17 AM. |
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Threaded Mode