I don't know if I'm missing something but this doesn't seem right. I know Armour Bonus etc. had problems in the past but I thought NGD fixed this one. It just doesn't make sense to me.
I tested two different Tunics against a Marks. He was using level 50 Arrows (Slashing) and a Mag Bow with fire damage bonuses. The first one was a level 50 Tenax Tunic
(200+6) which is
Excellent against Fire and
Normal against Slashing. The other was a level 47 Apocalypse Tunic
(192+2) which is
Good against Fire and
Normal against Slashing. The Tenax Tunic gave me a total of
219 AP and the Apocalypse Tunic gave me a total of
208 AP.
Wearing the Tenax Tunic gave the Marks an average hit of 330 while the Apocalypse Tunic gave him an average of 338. Meaning the Apocalypse Tunic has an overall defence which is better then the Tenax one. Looking back at the two Tunics and comparing their stats I'd say the Tenax should give a much better defence then the Apocalypse.
Thanks guys
Surfacing