Saetas

[NotScias]

Originally Posted by kmdk

Damage of marksman is give by RA . With RA he gains more dmg than a hunter.Without RA he has same dmg as hunter.

First, you act like if RA was totally removed, which is wrong. It's just given a downside that I believe is insignifiant in a decent RvR scenario.

Then, You seem to forget that a Dex point gives more damage to Marks than Hunters.
You also forgot the whole Arrow Mastery tree that got a good bunch of damagings and DoT spell + Ignore defense one that is unrivaled by hunters.
This plus Dead Eye and Hawks that greatly improves the DPS.

What hunters have over Marks in term of raw damage are Cold blood and Ensnaring, the first one being so short that is useless unless on surprise ganking while the latter is good but far to match all what Marksmen have alone.

So yeah Marks is still a good way above Hunter concerning overall damage even without RA at all, be it via normals or spells. And this even with non-uber gear. Don't tell me a hunter can match the damage from the Arrow Mastering tree alone except in some very particuliar situations...

Now the (broken) way the Armor system is working might make the difference much less obvious versus some people or under some circumstances, but in term of raw damage output/dps and assuming equal gear, I cannot see how a Hunter could match a Marks even without him using RA at all, assuming the marks isn't a static turret using only normals and thus highly depending on RA.

As a example it's confuse that had over 300 votes to be nefred and never was.

Confuse was 35s before, now 22s and limited to Hunters so I don't know how to call it besides a nerf. Hence why almost no one complains about it anymore ?

As usual we don't really know in what kind of world you are living to throw so much unfounded nonsense on almost every balance topic. (because default color is too mainstream)