Quote:
Originally Posted by Kyrenis
For some reason I keep coming back. You have no reading comprehension skills it seems.
I never said you hit 3k with ms, I implied you would if you had a 1 handed hammer with epic stats.
Also I AGREE with one of your points which I stated in my first post...
Words can't express the level of ignorance you are showing if you refuse to accept my points even if I AGREED with a point you made before you even suggested it.
|
Now, we seem to actually be getting somewhere. You also seem to be missing my point tho. MS is one thing. DPS is another. What does denying a 2-weapon-combo barb the use of nearly all endgame 1-handed blunt weaponry actually have to do with the issue of MS & it's perceived OP-imbalance? Nothing whatsoever at all.
I & others should NOT have to continue to wait to use these weapons until MS is made into a knight-only spell (In fact, I'd argue it should never become knight-only for reasons of RvR applications & the resulting 1/2-ing of MS being used: 1/2 lost due to cd being doubled months ago, another 1/2+ lost as well due to barbs no longer casting it, but that's entirely another subject).
Regardless, these 2 issues are totally unrelated. They only SEEM related because of how NGD unwisely chose to deal with this issue years ago. You say the one should precede from the other (take MS away, then get weapon choice), but I otherwise contend they stand entirely alone & are separate, unrelated issues. If MS is the problem, then NGD should fix MS. Don't obtusely deny me my choice of weapon. To do so is nonsensically unreasonable, contrived & unfair. THAT's what I'm saying.