|
|
The Inn A place to gather around and chat about almost any subject |
View Poll Results: MoD and Terror: Lame or not? | |||
MoD is not valid in PvP. (Terror is) | 14 | 43.75% | |
Terror is not valid. (MoD is) | 2 | 6.25% | |
Both are not valid. | 0 | 0% | |
Both are valid. | 12 | 37.50% | |
I don't care. | 4 | 12.50% | |
Voters: 32. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
05-17-2008, 01:28 PM | #24 |
Count
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: France
Posts: 1,416
|
MoD isn't valid for a PvP (game tradition and all that) except against a SotW user (only way to protect). Anyway, Archers weren't overpowered at the time PvP rules were meant.
Terror is valid but very lame. This is not the proper way to win a PvP, whatever the class, except Hunter with pet (because here at least you are trying to knock down the pet too). I'm talking about PvP as in "arranged pvp" AND "spontaneous pvp" when there are two players, alone and both full hp/mana. Both are war spells. Btw all this talk about "MoD is valid for PvP" was also in the Spanish Inn (where I guess Necro get his poll ideas) and it's really shameful to see so many people condoning winning at all cost rather than fighting with honor and winning using skills. And also many lv 50 warlocks who don't even know or understand about the rule... pts. Btw, MoD when you outnumber your enemy greatly (like 10+vs4-5) is lame too (special mention to some people here).
__________________
|
|
|