Quote:
Originally Posted by zielski
Usualy when someone want to express his opinion he write: In my opinion. But ofc you can express it like it was truth given you by God. Your choice.
|
I don't agree with that, actually. Whatever I am saying is obviously my opinion since I'm saying it. Adding "In my opinion" is just so you have an excuse if you end up being wrong.
Quote:
Originally Posted by GIGO305
Quote:
Originally Posted by swine
I have found being a healer very rewarding, but sometimes i get a bit frustrated at not being able to retaliate (as i play full support in the wz). But i have realised that i need to start another (attacking) character to vent my frustrations, rather than be a warjurer and let people down when they need healing.
|
thats a steriotype ![Thumb down](images/smilies/icon13.gif) those are pts not warjurer LEAR THE DIFERENCE! a warjurer is a fightback conju we do our part revive the posible heal and ocasional buff, we are not retards that pick the worng class.
|
On the same subject, this is an
opinion, not a stereotype.
I'm done with my nitpicking for the day
![Smile](images/smilies/smile.gif)
. I've only ever played a Marksman and a Knight. I don't have too much experience with either and I didn't know what I was doing when I made the Marksman, but the frustrating thing about the Marksman is the inability to take much damage once something gets to you. The Knight is nice in that he can take a decent amount of hits, but his attack power doesn't seem that great in comparison.
My experiences aren't worth much though, too much time passed between me making each of those characters that view is skewed by now.