|
|
General discussion Topics related to various aspects of Champions of Regnum |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Master
![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 264
![]() |
![]() Quote:
Maybe if Stalker is cast, the gem carrier, and all Pets would stay visible. (Though maybe the Pet should just be dismissed under Stalker as it is with the new Camo. On the otherhand, perhaps the new Camo could conceal hunters, but leave their Pets visible without dismissing them).
__________________
Bartle Test of Gamer Psychology |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Baron
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Svea Rike
Posts: 814
![]() |
![]()
That's not a problem exactly, that's is its intended function, even the pet being intended according to chilko's words. But whether it's intended or unintended that a gem carrier should be stalkered is irrelevant, because it simply shouldn't happen. You can stalker a gem carrier as long as they can't move, but once you add mobility into the mix then you can escape under it, and that just should not happen. Ever.
__________________
Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines...
|
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|