If you think that 5 times in a row creature evade is too much... - Page 2

ljwolfe · 12-23-2007, 01:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Xephandor

You know what Murphy says about life...

I think this is more about moronic coding vs. Murphy's law.

Pizdzius · 12-23-2007, 01:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ljwolfe

I think this is more about moronic coding vs. Murphy's law.

Adjective: moronic
Having a mental age of between eight and twelve years

Hmmm I don't quite believe a twelve year old would code such a thing. Maybe you're moronic, not knowing what does this word mean?

DemonMonger · 12-23-2007, 02:49 AM

i didnt see 6 evades in a row.. i also saw a resist... ;-)

ljwolfe · 12-23-2007, 03:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aardvak2669

Adjective: moronic
Having a mental age of between eight and twelve years

Hmmm I don't quite believe a twelve year old would code such a thing. Maybe you're moronic, not knowing what does this word mean?

That's exactly why I used the word. Coding this to have this many miss rates reflects the mental age of an 8year old. Besides, I was coding when I was 12. So try again.

ArcticWolf · 12-23-2007, 03:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aardvak2669

Adjective: moronic
Having a mental age of between eight and twelve years

Oh, you mean a pvp like Murphy vs Azakry?

Come on, people... Coding is hard, so balancing the equations and all that stuff. Remember that the code may act in mysterious ways sometimes, and more in a MMOG.

ncvr · 12-23-2007, 04:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ljwolfe

That's exactly why I used the word. Coding this to have this many miss rates reflects the mental age of an 8year old. Besides, I was coding when I was 12. So try again.

Ijwolfe, what would you think is more accurate in reality?

A bow and arrow shot from 30 metres, or a sword slashing from 10 centimetres away? It would make more sense for warriors to have more accuracy...

Valorius · 12-23-2007, 05:59 AM

The bow, because the archer (typically) doesn't have someone slashing back in his face, he is separated from his enemy(typically), so a cool headed archer or modern soldier will take careful aim and....bang.

"There is nothing as dangerous on the battlefield as one well aimed shot."
~Carlos N. Hathcock II, USMC Sniper, Vietnam, 93 confirmed kills.

ljwolfe · 12-23-2007, 07:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Necrovarus

Ijwolfe, what would you think is more accurate in reality?

A bow and arrow shot from 30 metres, or a sword slashing from 10 centimetres away? It would make more sense for warriors to have more accuracy...

What do you think would be easier to EVADE? Have you ever heard of anyone evading an arrow????!!!

ncvr · 12-23-2007, 09:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ljwolfe

What do you think would be easier to EVADE? Have you ever heard of anyone evading an arrow????!!!

Yes. :P

Have you ever heard of anyone evading a full-on stab in the chest?????!!!

ljwolfe · 12-23-2007, 09:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Necrovarus

Yes. :P

Have you ever heard of anyone evading a full-on stab in the chest?????!!!

umm yes. i've seen people train to do it in tae kwon do.

12-23-2007, 05:59 AM	#17
Valorius Banned Join Date: Jul 2007 Posts: 1,994	The bow, because the archer (typically) doesn't have someone slashing back in his face, he is separated from his enemy(typically), so a cool headed archer or modern soldier will take careful aim and....bang. *"There is nothing as dangerous on the battlefield as one well aimed shot."* ~Carlos N. Hathcock II, USMC Sniper, Vietnam, 93 confirmed kills. Last edited by Valorius; 12-24-2007 at 01:29 AM.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

12-23-2007, 02:49 AM	#13
DemonMonger Marquis Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Edge of the Abyss Posts: 2,066	i didnt see 6 evades in a row.. i also saw a resist... ;-)