What bugs you most about multi person combat

[Tyr]

Originally Posted by Znurre

So what I wish is that everyone just tries to help their teammates the best way possible.
Then we would all get a better game experience.

Sometimes the best way is not to rush in. Most of the time the attacker of your teammate is not the immediate threat it is the three others behind him. It is better to let one die and eliminate all of enemy then rush in both of you die letting the enemy regroup.

Read this and pay attention to points 1 and 4.

Originally Posted by SUN TZU

Thus we may know that there are five essentials for victory: (1) He will win who knows when to fight and when not to fight. (2) He will win who knows how to handle both superior and inferior forces. (3) He will win whose army is animated by the same spirit throughout all its ranks. (4) He will win who, prepared himself, waits to take the enemy unprepared. (5) He will win who has military capacity and is not interfered with by the sovereign.--SUN TZU ON THE ART OF WAR--

[G40st]

Damn never thought i would see anything out of the Art of war in this forum, its a great book




Znurre... you should stop weining about things and think for a second, u always rush forward to kill other players. So of course you are gonna die first but that's just the way life is, u run in the front line of course the first rounds are gonna hit u first.

And about the "cowards" that are running away i understand your frustration but don't u see that its better that you die then the 3 persons you are trying to help right? Because it's better to have 3 players in action then only 1.

And also they may think that u are helping them make an escape back to the pack instead of fighting 1v1, because we alsius fight best when all our warriors attack at once.


You have weined on a lot of things lately, the weapon speed update for example. All other players weined with u for a while, then they stopped u know why?
Because they realised all they had to do was change their tactics. You have started to change tactic now when u started using blunt which i think is great but u still wein over the weapon being so slow even when the fact is that u killed 4 syrtis all by yourself.

I just think that all you do is complain and complain but this is a beta u should complain about things but not as much as u are doing.
Stop complaining over spilled milk and change your tactics. Just a tip.

Valkyria - Commander Of Valhalla Freedom Fighters

[NightTwix]

Originally Posted by G40st

Damn never thought i would see anything out of the Art of war in this forum, its a great book

[...]

You have weined on a lot of things lately, the weapon speed update for example. All other players weined with u for a while, then they stopped u know why?
Because they realised all they had to do was change their tactics. You have started to change tactic now when u started using blunt which i think is great but u still wein over the weapon being so slow even when the fact is that u killed 4 syrtis all by yourself.

The Art of War is overrated in my opinion. Most stuff in there is obvious

and it wasnt just about the weapon speed. There were a LOT of downgrades for warriors.
and sure u have to fight with what u have. Blunt was state-of-the-art before the updates already

[Tyr]

Originally Posted by NightTwix

The Art of War is overrated in my opinion. Most stuff in there is obvious

Aren't all truths obvious once revealed?

[Ycremon]

Originally Posted by NightTwix
The Art of War is overrated in my opinion. Most stuff in there is obvious

Yes might be -- but for a immemorial Book (ca. 2400 y.)
it's to forgive

Originally Posted by Tyr
Aren't all truths obvious once revealed?

Very buddhist answer m8 -- nice

[G40st]

Originally Posted by NightTwix

Blunt was state-of-the-art before the updates already

Yes it was, but znurre was using slashing before and a while after the update so i said that it was good that he switched to blunt because then he would not be effected of the update as much because he would do more damage then with slashing.

Originally Posted by NightTwix

The Art of War is overrated in my opinion. Most stuff in there is obvious

Obvious for us today yes, but have in mind that this book was written 2400+ yearss ago and people still use it today. Maybe the stuff written in it is obvious, but's effective in planning and engaging into war even after 2000 years.

Because twix, wars are always fought the same way, the only difference is that the weapons get more hightech each time.

[NightTwix]

Originally Posted by G40st

Obvious for us today yes, but have in mind that this book was written 2400+ yearss ago and people still use it today. Maybe the stuff written in it is obvious, but's effective in planning and engaging into war even after 2000 years.

Because twix, wars are always fought the same way, the only difference is that the weapons get more hightech each time.

ok i didnt make myself clear.
i read it and thought its boring. when it was written it was cool, no question
but nowadays it only useful for managers who put it in their bookshelf to make them look evil