Marksman is overpowered afterall... xD

[amade]

If I'm not mistaken spells don't stack up either. So if someone casts DS lvl5 and then some lvl30ish casts DS lvl3 the other one gets cancelled. But since debuffs can be stacked with other debuffs of different classes but same type often there's more than enough debuffs going on anyway.

[NightTwix]

Originally Posted by amade

If I'm not mistaken spells don't stack up either. So if someone casts DS lvl5 and then some lvl30ish casts DS lvl3 the other one gets cancelled. But since debuffs can be stacked with other debuffs of different classes but same type often there's more than enough debuffs going on anyway.

yes, DS doesnt stack, it overrides just as any other buff.
But multiple -protection buffs work.
Still, somehow you can do insanly high damage from time to time on the dragon, which cant be explained easily.

look at the screen

its a 772/tick serpent.

[Pizdzius]

Originally Posted by NightTwix

its a 772/tick serpent.

I'm gonna lvl up my marks alt NOW

[adrianpf]

Originally Posted by NightTwix

yes, DS doesnt stack, it overrides just as any other buff.
But multiple -protection buffs work.
Still, somehow you can do insanly high damage from time to time on the dragon, which cant be explained easily.

look at the screen

its a 772/tick serpent.

Twix, long time ago I made some tests and I saw armour becoming negative. Today, after new tests I concluded in this:

- Negative Armour increases damage.

I already reported this bug. This dragon thing made me catch again this doubt about negative armour.

Now you know why those tremendous hits took place!

Regards!

[Pizdzius]

nice, negative armour? is that possible using debuffs and such?

[adrianpf]

Originally Posted by aardvak2669

nice, negative armour? is that possible using debuffs and such?

In the tests I've done:

Disable(5) (-70% protection) + Fatal Strike(5) (-70% protection)

Used this on a Barbarian with 490 armour points and left him with -180.

Damage with 0 armour (armour items off): 320
Damage with -180 armour: 350

[Pizdzius]

oh wow it shouldn't get percent from the basic but from the actual, then... it really makes it wicked!

[Snoid]

it seems NGD fails in maths...

if you take the 70% of a quantity, and then you take another 70%, you dont get a "negative" value. you just get... mmmm 9%? didn't use the calc, maybe im failing maths too (i used to)

[amade]

Ah, and all this while I thought you could never get below 0%. Surely this is a bug?

[adrianpf]

Originally Posted by amade

Ah, and all this while I thought you could never get below 0%. Surely this is a bug?

Is what I'm asking in my report. Maybe it's done like that to lower "natural armor" (as I thought and Piz said too).

I agree with Ramona, it should be stackable. 490 -70% = 147 - 70% = 44.1