|
|
General discussion Topics related to various aspects of Champions of Regnum |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
10-02-2011, 01:30 PM | #31 | |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Russia XD
Posts: 592
|
Quote:
|
|
10-02-2011, 01:36 PM | #32 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 843
|
|
10-02-2011, 01:37 PM | #33 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Russia XD
Posts: 592
|
|
10-02-2011, 01:38 PM | #34 | ||||
Marquis
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: England
Posts: 2,419
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
You describe a situation where you take a marksman totally by surprise, this is where the hunter has every advantage, but in its current state, a decent marks would still have a good chance, sotw doesn't last long and hunter damage is weak. Quote:
__________________
Faith 50 Barb Faithless 50 Lock
Umaril 45 Conju Kailas 45 Marks Pel 45 Knight |
||||
10-02-2011, 01:44 PM | #35 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 843
|
|
10-02-2011, 01:47 PM | #36 | |
Marquis
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: England
Posts: 2,419
|
Quote:
My other points are still valid, and your posts seem to simply scream out against marksmen losing their overpowered status. Whichever way you twist it, Marksmen, the offence subclass, has better defense in war than hunters, the defense subclass, that's just plain wrong. You don't need to play several hours a day and know every spells position and effect by heart to see that.
__________________
Faith 50 Barb Faithless 50 Lock
Umaril 45 Conju Kailas 45 Marks Pel 45 Knight |
|
10-02-2011, 02:03 PM | #37 | |||
Count
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Bavaria
Posts: 1,026
|
Quote:
Hunters can sometimes have some nice damage, yes, but all in all they're so much weaker than marksmen. Denying that marksmen deal more damage than hunters is retarded. 550 ensnare? Really not much, that's what marksmen deal with one normal hit. Quote:
Having to rely on confuse is lame, not to mention that it's nearly useless in fort wars, the main aspect of this game in case you didn't know. Yes, useless, because everyone is already buffed there, and you can enjoy your 50ish normal hits. Just play a hunter in fort wars ONCE. Only one time, and you'll know what we're talking about. Quote:
Why, only why could hunters want to be able to fight?! I don't get it.
__________________
|
|||
10-02-2011, 02:04 PM | #38 | |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 843
|
Quote:
The fact is hunter refuse they role about hunting. Hunter=hunt ,to hunt people,traking them,ganging them. A hunter by his main role is not defensive class at all. A hunter "HUNT",find enemys and surprise them and kill them...is that they role in actual gameplay. A hunter not means his a strong ranger in war,a hunter not means he is a strong defender in game. A basic hunter means if he surprise a enemys to kill him fast and if fail to be able to run fast. You just took wrong role of hunter in game about defender.Nope is not a defender,neighter a strong force in wars,but a ganger yes. |
|
10-02-2011, 02:15 PM | #40 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 843
|
Personal attack post from your side.Less arguments too.
I told is not a option to complete remove from a class a spell to give to other. How about to take out berseker from barbs to give to hunters?..hmm will be this a solution? Will solve this hunters problem if you give strategic the probleme vs warlock or vs barbarians?huh? Nope for sure.... I have the feeling that warlocks and hunters have a personal attack versus marksman and not real solutions from your side. The main target from ppl side is to nerf marksman and not to improve hunters. Inovation and ideas is the key. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|