![]() |
#11 |
Banned
![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Inside a house...
Posts: 280
![]() |
![]()
Excuse me to say this, but one player in ignis said go to RA and all of u followed like cheeps. U will never feel happy there and u will always miss haven moments if u want to leave this game just stop playing.
Yes there is an alsius zerg and now even bigger syrtis zerg come back to ignis put ur leggs on the ground and challange us. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Master
![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 347
![]() |
![]()
Hm do I see a pattern here or just me. Ex-Haven Ra players who went to Ra now asking for a merge..why, not happy with Ra eh? Or did you just decide on that old fb group (if it's still alive) that you'll make a thread and pat each other.
If you miss Haven why don't you just play your toons here. Haven is better than the recent past these days, of course it has the timezones but the most active hours are very active. Though Haven still needs a lot of players it's no rock bottom. Give it a shot without being judgemental or any prejudice. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Count
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Sofia, Bulgaria
Posts: 1,374
![]() |
![]()
What Horus (i hate the haven name...) needs is players. I played RA and for me Horus is more fun, but... we need players. I do not see how NGD will make our server more popular, so at the end merge will happen.
I have no problem with merge as i will keep char i play with here. If we are offered a transfer option to RA i will use it for sure. Last days i login see no activity and logout. Even if RA is more zergy i prefer to have some action. What stops me to go to RA is that i'm really sick of grinding. 3 conjus to 60 is my limit really. ![]()
__________________
RA | Ignis | Lilla My | Conjurer | EVIL IGNIS ROCK Horus | Syrtis | ieti | Conjurer | INQUISITION | LONG GONE |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Initiate
![]() ![]() Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Australia/USA
Posts: 176
![]() |
![]()
This probably should have been a poll rather than a petition.
I'm for this idea. While I prefer the small scale fort wars and invasions in Haven, bridge fights and hunting in Ra is much more enjoyable. A merged server could also support a high enough population for TDM without worrying about the effect on war. Besides, constant Spanish in chat can't be worse than reading the things players like Louna and Tania type. So what would the merged server be called? Raven? ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Master
![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 347
![]() |
![]()
Ha.æ¼µ╞±IτÜ
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
Baron
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Córdoba, España
Posts: 609
![]() |
![]()
Yo me uno a la petición también (I`m agree)
__________________
Leafar - afar - Ifar - Nanoroll - Nilafar EjeRcitO |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 | |
Banned
![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: New York City
Posts: 569
![]() |
![]() Quote:
They continue to attempt at this goal by merging the other smaller servers with Haven and hope it picks up(are there any other servers now?) Having more players on a server out weighs the negative it creates compared to a small server: - You can hunt or go to a fort war in Ra\ In Haven you cannot. - It's actually possible to grind off of war on Ra\ In Haven it's possible if you're willing to do that amount of time. I would comment on the amulet situation on Ra compared to Haven but I'd be pulling shit out of my ass because I don't play. As much as I like the community in Haven, that server is too community driven, if a group of people quit you feel it. If a group of people switch realms you feel it. Shall I go on? This hope of Haven getting this influx of people it needs to withstand is just another false hope we've all held onto like the promises NGD have made in the past at this point. I don't think I want to wait for NGD to make that "one" update they plan to pass to make changes in Haven. (dejavu) Granted, if what ever NGD plans does help Haven and makes it healthy I'll play sure, but in my opinion I think all troubles are solved with the merger of Ra. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
Count
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: United Kingdom, England
Posts: 1,038
![]() |
![]()
Lets not get hasty
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
Initiate
![]() ![]() Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Peterborough, Ontario
Posts: 189
![]() |
![]()
I am all for this idea. Though I am curious about what would happen to the Ra characters already on my account...
__________________
o Q o (WM), Martok (WM), Wyatt Earp (53), T'Pol (52), P'Tak (57), Rotarrin (38)
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
Apprentice
![]() Join Date: May 2014
Location: The Korr-Tabhar to Altaruk trade-route.
Posts: 81
![]() |
![]()
I'm actually against merging the servers as Horus was split off from Ra by request if memory serves. The solution to the current problems facing the smaller server is not a merger of any kind, but rather a strategic clean-up of the game in all ways: good working war mechanics, revitalized gameplay, rebalanced skill trees, no more disabled features, etc. as well as publicly and effectively advertising the game to the english-speaking clientele.
As for the nostalgia expressed for castle wars, there's already been an amazing suggestion as to how to solve that problem: make the realm gates almost impossible to break unless you have the dragon attacking too (except for overpopulated realms' gates). Then make the dragon only summonable with the castle relic, and make the dragon attack the gate rather than the players (unless a whole lot of players attack the dragon perhaps, but it should still keep trying to hit the gate). Perhaps the dragon should even be defeatable, but it would need to be really, really tough... The ball is in NGD's court now.
__________________
⌘ |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|