Multirealm Opinion Poll - Page 2

halvdan · 01-19-2016, 03:15 PM

I miss the option "What's the point of this poll?"

Tenel_Ka · 01-20-2016, 12:01 AM

Is nobody going to point out that 16 people chose the "I'm a multirealmer who believes multirealming is a problem" option?

Hollow-Ichigo · 01-20-2016, 01:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tenel_Ka

Is nobody going to point out that 16 people chose the "I'm a multirealmer who believes multirealming is a problem" option?

I thought I was the only one who noticed. This shit is hilarious

halvdan · 01-20-2016, 01:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tenel_Ka

Is nobody going to point out that 16 people chose the "I'm a multirealmer who believes multirealming is a problem" option?

I only think most people were just stupid and didn't even read the poll description right, and pushed the option containing most 'multirealm' keywords. Either way .. hilarious.

Ad Speciosum Puer · 04-14-2016, 10:21 PM

Multi-realming per se is not really the problem (except to realm loyalty purists). The problem is the timing of the logovers (too many just want to play in the current zerg realm).

IF some security-mechanic could be encoded into game that disallows switching (for say an hour or more), that keeps track of all pc's (not ip's) that use or have used NGD accts., then all would have to play where they were atm, or wait at least an hour to play elsewhere.

Is this 'solution' even possible; does such a database of user-pc's exist or can it be created? There are ways around ip-tracking: changing ip, having more than one internet access, etc. A pc-chipset-id methodology for blocking users' access could conceivably end, or at least curtail, both multi-realming as well as multi-logging (but shared users would suffer hour long waits between sessions; a price worth paying?).

Opinions?

trelane · 04-27-2016, 06:36 PM

Sometimes I get the impression that multis log into a realm and feed players to other realms, specifically to give the other realms RP, etc.

I spent about an hour following a player to war at Aggers over and over again without getting any XP. And our tiny group got few, if any, kills.

As a small group I got more XP when we were hunting for stragglers. It's really all one can do with such small numbers.

But our "leader" wasn't changing their tactics or anything so I started to wonder, "Are they doing this on purpose? Because there's really nothing in it for us, just the enemy."

Maybe I should've voted "BIGGEST PROBLEM" instead of just "PROBLEM"...

Best,
Tre

rinky · 04-30-2016, 04:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by halvdan

I only think most people were just stupid and didn't even read the poll description right, and pushed the option containing most 'multirealm' keywords. Either way .. hilarious.

Perhaps they multi-realm to break the game on purpose? Nahh...

Perhaps they multi-realm and see they problems they create? Nahhh...

I'm sure there's some semi-logical explanation for this.

Rinky

View Poll Results: (Your Realm) Multirealming is __________ for realm balance on Haven.
(multirealm) the biggest problem	18	41.86%
(multirealm) a problem	2	4.65%
(multirealm) not a problem	2	4.65%
(Syrtis) the biggest problem	3	6.98%
(Syrtis) a problem	2	4.65%
(Syrtis) not a problem	1	2.33%
(Ignis) the biggest problem	0	0%
(Ignis) a problem	2	4.65%
(Ignis) not a problem	2	4.65%
(Alsius) the biggest problem	4	9.30%
(Alsius) a problem	3	6.98%
(Alsius) not a problem	2	4.65%
(no realm) the biggest problem	1	2.33%
(no realm) a problem	0	0%
(no realm) not a problem	1	2.33%
Voters: 43. You may not vote on this poll

01-19-2016, 03:15 PM	#11
halvdan Master Join Date: Nov 2012 Location: Kogoruhn Posts: 319	I miss the option "What's the point of this poll?" __________________ A better world.

04-27-2016, 06:36 PM	#16
trelane Pledge Join Date: May 2009 Location: Hollywood, CA. USA Posts: 30	Multis feeding players to other realms. Sometimes I get the impression that multis log into a realm and feed players to other realms, specifically to give the other realms RP, etc. I spent about an hour following a player to war at Aggers over and over again without getting any XP. And our tiny group got few, if any, kills. As a small group I got more XP when we were hunting for stragglers. It's really all one can do with such small numbers. But our "leader" wasn't changing their tactics or anything so I started to wonder, "Are they doing this on purpose? Because there's really nothing in it for us, just the enemy." Maybe I should've voted "BIGGEST PROBLEM" instead of just "PROBLEM"... Best, Tre

01-20-2016, 12:01 AM	#12
Tenel_Ka Initiate Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Australia/USA Posts: 176	Is nobody going to point out that 16 people chose the "I'm a multirealmer who believes multirealming is a problem" option?

04-14-2016, 10:21 PM	#15
Ad Speciosum Puer Banned Join Date: Dec 2014 Posts: 25	Multi-realming per se is not really the problem (except to realm loyalty purists). The problem is the timing of the logovers (too many just want to play in the current zerg realm). IF some security-mechanic could be encoded into game that disallows switching (for say an hour or more), that keeps track of all pc's (not ip's) that use or have used NGD accts., then all would have to play where they were atm, or wait at least an hour to play elsewhere. Is this 'solution' even possible; does such a database of user-pc's exist or can it be created? There are ways around ip-tracking: changing ip, having more than one internet access, etc. A pc-chipset-id methodology for blocking users' access could conceivably end, or at least curtail, both multi-realming as well as multi-logging (but shared users would suffer hour long waits between sessions; a price worth paying?). Opinions?