Most effective/least effective class in WZ? - Page 2

Vroek · 01-13-2008, 02:13 PM

Barbarians are very good when you control the battle but pretty much useless when your enemies have more control.
Because of barbarians relative weakness, high damage and exposed position in the front lines they often be primary targets.

I have to say Marksmen are most effective since they perform well in all situations.

Both Hunters and barbarians are very effective in the open field but less at fort wars and big group battles.

fluffy_muffin · 01-13-2008, 03:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vroek

[...]
Both Hunters and barbarians are very effective in the open field but less at fort wars and big group battles.

i am goin to do more tests with sneaky hunter at fort fights.
3days ago i could disable conj i igni group and runn away so i want to test how it will be with lvl3hinder and lvl5 repetition shot

-Paradox- · 01-13-2008, 03:31 PM

I think barbarians are the most effective, yes they get targeted at fort battles but if you have say 5 or more barbarians at your side charging the enemy they usually retreat and run away.

misaccc · 01-13-2008, 03:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -Paradox-

I think barbarians are the most effective, yes they get targeted at fort battles but if you have say 5 or more barbarians at your side charging the enemy they usually retreat and run away.

or cast sultar and few other areas...heh what do u think happens?
i would say that the most effective is either a marksman or a conju...

-Paradox- · 01-13-2008, 04:10 PM

Quote:

or cast sultar and few other areas...heh what do u think happens?
i would say that the most effective is either a marksman or a conju...

Sure you can knock them down and continue to attack them with ur rangers only for them to be healed again by the conjurers which means practically nothing has changed, but if barbarians were there and charged while they were knocked down that would come close to destroying thier army =]

Vroek · 01-13-2008, 04:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -Paradox-

I think barbarians are the most effective, yes they get targeted at fort battles but if you have say 5 or more barbarians at your side charging the enemy they usually retreat and run away.

You describe a situation where one side has some sort of control
in that situation barbarians are very effective.
But this is not barbarians being effective its a team being effective allowing barbarians to excel.
But 90% of the time they just stand there doing nothing, waiting to be charged by numerous enemies or maybe casting onslaught to help people get to safety or leach some points.

-Paradox- · 01-13-2008, 04:28 PM

Quote:

You describe a situation where one side has some sort of control
in that situation barbarians are very effective.
But this is not barbarians being effective its a team being effective allowing barbarians to excel.
But 90% of the time they just stand there doing nothing, waiting to be charged by numerous enemies or maybe casting onslaught to help people get to safety or leach some points.

Well im just sayin im what im seeing when im at samal with ignis trying to get it back. Barb will charge and push the enemy back.

Vroek · 01-13-2008, 04:37 PM

Sometimes that happens but who are the once that get left behind and killed when you retreat?
Yes low levels, warlocks and warriors you wont see mana high level archer or conjurers die.

LenaRosemberg · 01-13-2008, 05:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vroek

I have to say Marksmen are most effective since they perform well in all situations.

I find my marskman very week when I'm less than 20m away from an ennemy and we don't have huge normal hit.

Vroek · 01-13-2008, 08:15 PM

If insulted barbarians im very sorry

Since i played barbarian for about a year now maybe i could be forgiven.
I know all classes play their role and barbarians certainly have one
I just dont see it as effectiveness when your not even taking part for long periods in battles.
In fact when a opposing team do what they are supposed to do barbarians pose little to no threat.
Insulting as it may be barbarians are not effective
but they can have moments when they dominate completely.

01-13-2008, 02:13 PM	#11
Vroek Banned Join Date: Dec 2006 Posts: 890	Barbarians are very good when you control the battle but pretty much useless when your enemies have more control. Because of barbarians relative weakness, high damage and exposed position in the front lines they often be primary targets. I have to say Marksmen are most effective since they perform well in all situations. Both Hunters and barbarians are very effective in the open field but less at fort wars and big group battles.

01-13-2008, 03:31 PM	#13
-Paradox- Apprentice Join Date: Oct 2007 Posts: 82	I think barbarians are the most effective, yes they get targeted at fort battles but if you have say 5 or more barbarians at your side charging the enemy they usually retreat and run away.

01-13-2008, 04:37 PM	#18
Vroek Banned Join Date: Dec 2006 Posts: 890	Sometimes that happens but who are the once that get left behind and killed when you retreat? Yes low levels, warlocks and warriors you wont see mana high level archer or conjurers die.

01-13-2008, 08:15 PM	#20
Vroek Banned Join Date: Dec 2006 Posts: 890	If insulted barbarians im very sorry Since i played barbarian for about a year now maybe i could be forgiven. I know all classes play their role and barbarians certainly have one I just dont see it as effectiveness when your not even taking part for long periods in battles. In fact when a opposing team do what they are supposed to do barbarians pose little to no threat. Insulting as it may be barbarians are not effective but they can have moments when they dominate completely.