Knight or Barbarian - Page 2

-Edge- · 09-01-2008, 06:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cool_is_i

Here are the pros and cons, imho:

Barbarian:
Pros-
MASSIVE damage [im 36 i can hit 1200] highest hitters in RO
very low armor

Cons-
Crappy looking armor [leather stuff, only armor i like, is executionor lv38]
Die very VERY fast.

Pros-
Knight:
Very VERY resistant to attacks [me and 3 hunters were pounding down on him, he survived for bout 15min.]
AWSOM AWSOM ARMOR!

Cons-
Crappy damage [no offence]

Barbs and Knights are completely opposite

Gl picking

those aren't very good descriptions, its more like a 5 minute sum up of how the world is in your eyes. OFC the knight will say the barb is stronger and the barb will say the knight is stronger.

People in this game fail to realize the positive side of their character, so we ask ourselves, why did you pick your class?

-RedStar- · 09-01-2008, 10:02 PM

Atm a barbarian is the class that imo depends least on luck, has ok physical reduction(magical damage is a killer but atleast 60% of all damage in game is physical), they have the best CC resistance in game with a lvl19 spell which costs alot of mana tho, good speed(they can buff entire armies with a speed bonus, but again it costs alot of mana) and great damage.
Knights on the other hand have a little less physical reduction but they replace that with blocks which totaly depend on luck, but most of the time you atleast block 1/3 of the hits directed to you so its ok. Their CC resistance is worse then the one of the barbarian with the exception of knockdown resistance because of the higher constitution.They are slow and deal medium damage(they can do good damage with a "knarb" setup, meaning they invest more points into weapon buffs). They have usefull auras that can protect allies, but like barb spells they cost alot.

09-01-2008, 10:02 PM	#12
-RedStar- Banned Join Date: Aug 2008 Posts: 28	Atm a barbarian is the class that imo depends least on luck, has ok physical reduction(magical damage is a killer but atleast 60% of all damage in game is physical), they have the best CC resistance in game with a lvl19 spell which costs alot of mana tho, good speed(they can buff entire armies with a speed bonus, but again it costs alot of mana) and great damage. Knights on the other hand have a little less physical reduction but they replace that with blocks which totaly depend on luck, but most of the time you atleast block 1/3 of the hits directed to you so its ok. Their CC resistance is worse then the one of the barbarian with the exception of knockdown resistance because of the higher constitution.They are slow and deal medium damage(they can do good damage with a "knarb" setup, meaning they invest more points into weapon buffs). They have usefull auras that can protect allies, but like barb spells they cost alot.