How Will Duel Wielding Be Implemented? - Page 2

Mattdoesrock · 03-24-2010, 06:58 PM

Then what would be the point of Knights? They'd just be weak Barbarians with a useless Shield skill tree... Oo

Arafails · 03-25-2010, 01:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by n4gh4sh

Are you all so sure that dual wielding will be for barbarians ?

I see it more suitable for knights. Whatever way it will be implemented, it will make a warrior deal more dmg using 1 handed weapons. This would make knights grind faster than now (now grinding a knight is much too slow) and make knights more usable in war.

Yes.

Knights aren't meant to do lots of damage. QED.

UmarilsStillHere · 03-25-2010, 06:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by n4gh4sh

Are you all so sure that dual wielding will be for barbarians ?

The discription of the warrior class mentions dual weilding, the 2 Handed Mastery Tree mentions Dual weilding, so yeah, pretty sure.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mattdoesrock

Then what would be the point of Knights? They'd just be weak Barbarians with a useless Shield skill tree... Oo

But we have Ao1!

=<

03-24-2010, 06:58 PM	#11
Mattdoesrock Count Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: England, UK. Posts: 1,055	Then what would be the point of Knights? They'd just be weak Barbarians with a useless Shield skill tree... Oo __________________ MattdoesJOKE_#40_NOT_FOUND RA / Hor... Haven?