03-04-2013, 04:40 AM | #11 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: New York City
Posts: 569
|
Didn't know this alliance still existed, we've been battling Alsius all week. Syrtis seems dead, and we're the low populated realm, go figure.
|
03-04-2013, 07:46 AM | #12 | |
Master
Join Date: May 2010
Location: England
Posts: 455
|
Quote:
As for the alliance, outside of the instances, this is not of importance in this thread. There is no benefit to any 2 realm alliances in the instances. I've queued up for CTF various times, Scias. I still haven't been able to try it but from what you have said, it certainly sounds more balanced than the TDM map. I would like to give it a try though! |
|
03-04-2013, 08:10 AM | #13 |
Baron
Join Date: May 2010
Location: South Africa
Posts: 906
|
I don't roll for CTF because quite simply the chances of getting a match are very slim. The real problem is that everyone else thinks the same way which ironically is the reason for the chances of getting in being so slim.
|
03-04-2013, 09:02 AM | #14 |
Pledge
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 24
|
I'm in for a CTF.We should establish a date on this thread when more ppl can join.
Got really sick of TDM's.Ignis has always like 4+ barb in every TDM. |
03-04-2013, 09:23 AM | #15 | |
Baron
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Czech Republic
Posts: 769
|
Quote:
@Nohan, I second what Awrath wrote. Ignis/alsius alliance was perhaps present during the time when Syrtis was riddiculously overpopulated, farming our forts. At the present time, I'm not aware of anything similar going on (although I admit, that I don't join fort wars much recently). On the original topic - I'd like to try CTF sometime - but as some wrote, the overall trend on Haven dictates only TDM instance - perhaps someone could coordinate a CTF attempt sometime?
__________________
Kharbon
Proud member of CZ/SK WM - WM - WM - 56 - 53 - 50 |
|
03-04-2013, 02:04 PM | #16 |
Baron
Join Date: May 2010
Location: South Africa
Posts: 906
|
What he's saying is 100% true. Ignis always seems to have well structured teams. A well structured team consists of lots of barbs and a few conjurers, maybe a knight or two. Which is most likely the reason Ignis wins the large majority of the death matches.
In Alsius we would be lucky to have more than three barbs in a team. Syrtis seems to have a number of barbarians too but I'm noticing that alot of them are just terrible at playing the barbarian class. Flavor of the month re-rollers I'll assume. Its sad that the quality of your team is based on how much barbarians you have on it. It just proves how blatantly overpowered this class is. |
03-04-2013, 02:30 PM | #17 | |
Pledge
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 27
|
Quote:
I welcome a CTF match awrath. Let me know when.
__________________
"To Thine Ownself be true." |
|
03-04-2013, 02:48 PM | #18 |
Baron
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Nowhere
Posts: 765
|
I thought CTF directed you to TDM?
It was reported not long ago I think.
__________________
Suggestion Compilation! |The Story of Regnum! | L2MassResurrect Huntrare | Amelia Woodheart To play or not to play...
|
03-04-2013, 03:20 PM | #19 |
Initiate
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 234
|
First couple of days/weeks Syrtis were the ones with all the barbs in TDM and no one could do anything. Now Ignis and don't forget Alsius is perfectly capable of bringing up a team full of conjurers, barbs and knights. It's all random depending on the day, week or hour. So really, the main issue here isn't realm balance, it's class balance being there's too many barbs queuing for TDM. Which is why there should be class restrictions. Like just for example: 3 barbs max in one group, 3 marks max in one group, 2 conjurers max in one group etc.
|
03-04-2013, 03:46 PM | #20 | |
Master
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Wonderland
Posts: 308
|
Quote:
i like the idea, but that could make it harder to get enough people for a fight in Haven, not many people queue and with all the restrictions could be hard to get enough |
|
|
|