05-13-2011, 08:46 PM | #191 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 468
|
|
05-14-2011, 02:13 PM | #192 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Russia XD
Posts: 592
|
Only for locks that use SM gear makes a sence.
For spells all u need is timing and good ping. BTW^ my stupid setup Last edited by NSer; 05-14-2011 at 02:29 PM. |
05-15-2011, 09:38 AM | #193 | |
Count
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: England
Posts: 1,300
|
Quote:
It looks like a warjurer set up, but without the benefit of the heals and the summon. |
|
05-15-2011, 09:54 AM | #194 |
Apprentice
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 61
|
high resist/evade percentage on lower lvl locks
Well playing a lock was fun. Having a lower lvl lock is pretty useless nowadays.
The spells of my lvl50 lock get resisted/evaded for 70/80%. That makes the char completely useless and no fun anymore playing it. Perhaps it is due to all the bugs, sad but true that from a technical point of view RO still is garbage (lots of bugs, lag). It always has been that way, so suppose it will always stay that way. So saying farewell to my lock. RO is getting less fun to play anyhow .... would love to have the game version of early december 2009 back. |
05-15-2011, 10:22 AM | #195 | |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Russia XD
Posts: 592
|
Quote:
Ehm... don't think that it's similar to warjurer setup,coz it has low mentals,no sorcery. But Vamp 5 doing great :P . |
|
05-15-2011, 01:34 PM | #196 | ||
Apprentice
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Hungary
Posts: 74
|
Quote:
Lock can grind with SM really good, I'm leveling my lock usually with SM. But in war it's useless I think. Simple it costs too much points and isn't so effective. Quote:
1) you can't see the numbers of spell focus/spell resistance. 2) you don't have critical attacks that always lands and hits harder. 3) the difference between levels is only the resist rate, I think it shouldn't be like this. Lower level, lower spells' damage, but the resist rate should almost the same.
__________________
Saturas - warlock (Horus) |
||
05-15-2011, 02:11 PM | #197 | |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Russia XD
Posts: 592
|
Quote:
P. S. There was this setup |
|
05-17-2011, 03:32 PM | #198 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 468
|
|
05-18-2011, 04:59 PM | #199 | |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Russia XD
Posts: 592
|
Quote:
|
|
05-19-2011, 11:58 AM | #200 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 468
|
To be honest, I play very mana-watching. My mana is almost always around 1K and I have 2,1K mana... though I don't like this setup myself im trying this one out now:
http://trainer.claninquisition.org/t...aaqzadzauLFsaa |
|
|