RNG update at Amun!

[LawZ]

Originally Posted by Iheartpancakes

Agreed. Hopefully the reward is based on how much you actually contribute to the fight, not just how long you're there.

I would recommend to leave this discussion for a future topic. Besides, as Adrian mentioned in his feedback post, the reward system will be implemented in the future(?). If that's the case, it's too early to speculate anything imo.

I am still worried for spring and bless spells. Expecting the new AMUN patch by mid-week...

Best,

[Sentan]

Originally Posted by LawZ

I am still worried for spring and bless spells. Expecting the new AMUN patch by mid-week...

Spring is fine but attack speed on bless seems to be too OP (due to dual-wield:P). Imagine a barbarian with 2x rols: 10% as, off hand 5% as+7% as gem, medium sword or fast ignean axe 5%as+7%as gem, +5% as leggs, thirst for blood +15% as and bless +10% -> 64% attack speed lol

off: btw why barb can have two gems while using dual-wield? Is there any sensible argument? :P Add socket to arrows, shields, two-handed weapons and bracelets aswell :P

[Candyx]

I hope the reward is a fixed number of wmc. Say 5k, divide between all those allies involved. That way the underpopulated realm has a real incentive to return to forts where they are massively outnumbered.

5 Syrtians get 1k each, 25 Alsians get 200 each.

[Iheartpancakes]

Originally Posted by Sentan

off: btw why barb can have two gems while using dual-wield? Is there any sensible argument? :P Add socket to arrows, shields, two-handed weapons and bracelets aswell :P

Because an offhand constitutes as a weapon, and only weapons may have damage gems. It makes no sense to add damage gems to shields, and +15 damage gems in arrows is too much, hence why the physical and elemental damage is limited to +10 each on them.

[Sentan]

Originally Posted by Iheartpancakes

Because an offhand constitutes as a weapon, and only weapons may have damage gems. It makes no sense to add damage gems to shields, and +15 damage gems in arrows is too much, hence why the physical and elemental damage is limited to +10 each on them.

So what about arrows?

[Iheartpancakes]

Originally Posted by Sentan

So what about arrows?

As I said already, arrows are limited to +10 damage, but gems can be +15

[Sentan]

Originally Posted by Iheartpancakes

As I said already, arrows are limited to +10 damage, but gems can be +15

Staffs are limited to +25, warrior weapons +20, bows +15, arrows +10. So gems for staffs should be +25 by this way?

[Iheartpancakes]

Originally Posted by Sentan

Staffs are limited to +25, warrior weapons +20, bows +15, arrows +10. So gems for staffs should be +25 by this way?

Of course not. It's fine to go lower, but exceeding the maximum makes no sense at all.

[Sentan]

Originally Posted by Iheartpancakes

Of course not. It's fine to go lower, but exceeding the maximum makes no sense at all.

So you think that dual-wield is balanced? Compare it with two-handed weapons :P Give enhancement slot to bracelet and shield because they are a part of the armor.

<EDIT>

Yeah, then add enhancement slots. :P

[Iheartpancakes]

Originally Posted by Sentan

So you think that dual-wield is balanced? Compare it with two-handed weapons :P Give enhancement slot to bracelet and shield because they are a part of the armor.

Aha, I never said it was balanced. I was simply explaining why you can't socket a shield or arrows. I'm not about to get into a debate on balance!