|
|
Questions to the Community Guides and how-to play threads posted by other users |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
07-18-2014, 02:52 PM | #21 | |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: 'B-F-Egypt', Virginia, U.S.A. (please pity & forgive us poor american fools!).
Posts: 605
|
Quote:
Hurrdurr I want to buff! lol only EVERYone buffs. I know better than to EVER say or ask that, ffs... ...Hell, most can't play even WITH buffs! |
|
07-19-2014, 12:43 AM | #22 |
Initiate
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: New York
Posts: 102
|
You really don't understand sarcasm, do you?
__________________
Saerolyth|Nelaeryn|Celestial|Hollow|Kyrenis
WM barb WM marx WM conj WM knight 60 lock |
07-19-2014, 08:18 PM | #23 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: 'B-F-Egypt', Virginia, U.S.A. (please pity & forgive us poor american fools!).
Posts: 605
|
|
07-20-2014, 01:07 AM | #24 |
Initiate
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: New York
Posts: 102
|
Ok, do you have anything meaningful to add? If you are just spouting this garbage it is clear that you don't have a good argument.
inb4 You are just acting like a child because you can't spam the most overpowered spell in the game on the easiest class without sacrificing some DPS.
__________________
Saerolyth|Nelaeryn|Celestial|Hollow|Kyrenis
WM barb WM marx WM conj WM knight 60 lock |
07-20-2014, 10:52 AM | #25 | ||
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: 'B-F-Egypt', Virginia, U.S.A. (please pity & forgive us poor american fools!).
Posts: 605
|
Quote:
You are just acting like a child because you STILL cannot qualitatively or quantitatively justify exactly why casting MS every 40 seconds (NOT spam, ffs) must oddly & irrationally also require sacrificing some DPS (uh, in fact, ALOT of DPS). Quote:
NGD recently chose to nerf MS in cd, but not effect. Their choice. Previous 1-handed blunt weapon selection limits were in place based upon the effect of that 20 sec cd MS (really bad idea from the start imho, but it was what it was). Now MS has a 40 sec cd & yet, no riciprocity at all? Blunt-primary 2-weapon-combo barbs lose 1/2 of our ability to cast this so-called OP spell & then get absolutely nothing in return to balance matters? Weapon selection denial was an imbalanced & unfair method to begin with, now it's twice as imbalanced & unfair. We lost even more & get nothing in return?! FFS! No other subclass sacrifices weapon selection for the ability to cast one spell. Even barbs don't, IF they choose to wield edged or pierce & have blunt tree skilled only for the purpose to cast MS, then they switch back to a UNnaturally higher-dps edged or pierce weapon. Realistically, why should those 2-weapon-combo barbs who choose blunt as their completely primary weapon type be denied in this matter? It's simply illogical & unjustifiable. Does a 50% chance versus a 40% chance truly justify the near-total denial of all 1-handed endgame-blunt weapons in the currently contrived way of things? Not on your life. I want to read a REAL reason for this ongoing farce (tho I truly doubt one exists) ... not more complete bs (like I said: real reasons, not excuses)... OR I want to fairly choose freely from a completely FULL blunt selection of ALL endgame weaponry, exactly the same as ALL edged & pierce barbs already get to do. Last edited by Lebeau; 07-20-2014 at 11:06 AM. |
||
07-20-2014, 11:53 AM | #26 | |
Initiate
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: New York
Posts: 102
|
Quote:
K I'm really done now, no point in trying to knock sense into someone that is in his own little bubble. Enjoy living in Lebeau land, where only Lebeau's opinion counts. inb4 quotes my post and puts random words in bold/italics to try to contradict me, all the while failing miserably.
__________________
Saerolyth|Nelaeryn|Celestial|Hollow|Kyrenis
WM barb WM marx WM conj WM knight 60 lock Last edited by Kyrenis; 07-20-2014 at 12:11 PM. |
|
07-20-2014, 02:03 PM | #27 | |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: 'B-F-Egypt', Virginia, U.S.A. (please pity & forgive us poor american fools!).
Posts: 605
|
Quote:
K I'm really not even started yet, I'll never give up trying to refute the public non-sense of someone that is in his own little bubble. Enjoy living in Kyrensis land, where only Kyrensis' opinion counts. inb4 quotes my post and puts random words in bold/italics to try to contradict me, all the while failing miserably? Oh no, you contradict yourself & miserably fail your position by pretending that your personal desire, vitriolic disdain & brazen insults can adequately masquerade as any sort of thorough & reasoned answer to any of my questions. ASSiNINNYty! You can't to any degree refute my message at all, so you attack the messenger? That's so f-ing OVERplayed by gelftard-zergster-loser-fooks it's beyond typical, it has become completely ubiquitous now.... Treat the problem directly, not something that's unrelated. Quit thinking in limited &/or pvp-only perspectives. See a balanced big-picture. FFS, if the spell MS is the problem, then changing MS is obviously the answer. Just how dafuq can nerf-capping primary-blunt-barbs' 2-weapon-combo DPS fix MS? It can't; it never did; it doesn't now; it never will.... If u honestly believe by disallowing 2-weapon-combo barbs the use of most of the existing 1-handed blunt endgame weapons that this issue is then adequately answered, & a fair & balanced good-sense solution (assuming MS actually IS an issue to begin with), then u r too thoughtless or obtuse atm to have a rational discussion. I utterly refuse to have a battle of wits with a (currently) completely disarmed & unstable opponent. Hurrdurr, 'I so hate the evil MS, therefore blunt users (but only 1/2, the ones using 2-weapon-combo) must be punitively penalized & have reduced dps cuz I hate them too' is no argument whatsoever. It's just completely unfair, imbalanced, perhaps deranged, & totally nonsensical bs. Post a reply when (& only when) u truly have something valid & substantive to present in actual contructive defense of your INdefensible position, k? ... or will u insist on oneupmanship & demand to have the last word one more time, tho yet again u will essentially say nothing relevant of any importance? IF so, don't waste any more of our time p & ty. |
|
07-20-2014, 02:12 PM | #28 | |
Initiate
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: New York
Posts: 102
|
Quote:
As I said, I gave my points earlier but you refuse to listen to them. Therefore you are just an immature little manchild who can't play without his precious 3k MS hits. Have fun, I'm not even going to look at this thread anymore
__________________
Saerolyth|Nelaeryn|Celestial|Hollow|Kyrenis
WM barb WM marx WM conj WM knight 60 lock |
|
07-20-2014, 02:52 PM | #29 | ||
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: 'B-F-Egypt', Virginia, U.S.A. (please pity & forgive us poor american fools!).
Posts: 605
|
Quote:
No more insults, no more bs. Now, quit changing the fookin' subject & just answer the fookin' questions.... Your answer btw: As I am an UNfairly nerfcapped-DPS 2-weapon-combo blunt-barb who uses only blunt, I just don't get 3k hits, ever (even on fulminating crits, MS or otherwise). FYI: only (every 10 sec) SC-spammin' & (every 20 secs) Riposte-caster or some very-slow-weapon big-hitters get that kinda' damage, bub-bah-loo. Be very careful who u accuse of what, unless u truly know the realities. Doing otherwise is being an "immature little manchild". I am sorry my posts are so beyond your current level of comprehension that they seem rather lost on you & as such, are judged incorrectly by you to be "worthless walls of text" that "makes no sense at all". 'Nuff said! I now repeat again (& hopefully u will listen THIS time): Quote:
|
||
07-20-2014, 03:01 PM | #30 | ||
Initiate
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: New York
Posts: 102
|
Quote:
I never said you hit 3k with ms, I implied you would if you had a 1 handed hammer with epic stats. Also I AGREE with one of your points which I stated in my first post... Quote:
__________________
Saerolyth|Nelaeryn|Celestial|Hollow|Kyrenis
WM barb WM marx WM conj WM knight 60 lock |
||
|
|