Confuse Being Modified Next Release?? - Page 3

BlooD · 01-11-2008, 06:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by misaccc

ummm...yea heres an example:i use spears but i need to switch to mace to mind squash some knight then quickly to spear so i can balestra him and stop him from runnin away.but well i dunno ill test it to see if its that bad

And all that in less than a second? Man you are the best warrior i have been seen.

trulyem · 01-11-2008, 08:34 PM

Quote:

I dont know why you will dont like this update, the change is about changing more than a weapon per second, you really change that fast your weapons?

I e/s everytime i fight, fyi :P

Valorius · 01-12-2008, 12:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by misaccc

ummm...yea heres an example:i use spears but i need to switch to mace to mind squash some knight then quickly to spear so i can balestra him and stop him from runnin away.but well i dunno ill test it to see if its that bad

And that seems even remotley realisitic to you?

1 weapon change per second is presumably to stop the sort of -imo- abuses you list above.
With the fix you could switch to hammer, but you'd then have to wait 1 full second before going back to spear. I personally don't think that wait time is long enough....1 second is not a long time at all.

daresbalat · 01-12-2008, 12:28 AM

Realistic or not changing the times will affect barbs the most. So while it might be good for realism it'd be bad for balance. Take that as you will.

Valorius · 01-12-2008, 12:32 AM

But IMO properly played and set up barbs are already over powered vs the other classes. One look at the RP leaders list makes that totally clear. The funniest part is, i think they were easier before they were 'nerfed' in the last update.

ncvr · 01-12-2008, 02:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Valorius

But IMO properly played and set up barbs are already over powered vs the other classes. One look at the RP leaders list makes that totally clear. The funniest part is, i think they were easier before they were 'nerfed' in the last update.

Sometimes barbs don't even get to the enemy.

Quote:

Originally Posted by sathilda

A warlock can kill a barb before pricking ivy(5) is down.

Pricking ivy(5) is equivelant to Twister(3) except Twister stops multiple opponents.

trulyem · 01-12-2008, 02:59 AM

Barb's weren't nerfed in the last update, but, since you are comparing it to the rankings, barbs have more chances of attaining most rps from a kill.

ncvr · 01-12-2008, 03:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by trulyem

Barb's weren't nerfed in the last update, but, since you are comparing it to the rankings, barbs have more chances of attaining most rps from a kill.

Supposedly they were nerfed because Thirst for Blood was modified.

trulyem · 01-12-2008, 04:42 AM

I dont use TFB =/

ncvr · 01-12-2008, 08:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by trulyem

I dont use TFB =/

Aughh..

That's the point.

I meant the OLD TFB. Surely you used that?

01-12-2008, 12:28 AM	#24
daresbalat Master Join Date: Jul 2007 Posts: 344	Realistic or not changing the times will affect barbs the most. So while it might be good for realism it'd be bad for balance. Take that as you will.

01-12-2008, 12:32 AM	#25
Valorius Banned Join Date: Jul 2007 Posts: 1,994	But IMO properly played and set up barbs are already over powered vs the other classes. One look at the RP leaders list makes that totally clear. The funniest part is, i think they were easier before they were 'nerfed' in the last update.

01-12-2008, 02:59 AM	#27
trulyem Master Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Asia Posts: 335	Barb's weren't nerfed in the last update, but, since you are comparing it to the rankings, barbs have more chances of attaining most rps from a kill.

01-12-2008, 04:42 AM	#29
trulyem Master Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Asia Posts: 335	I dont use TFB =/