Fighting with SOTW - Page 3

makarios68 · 08-28-2008, 10:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Miraculix

SotW-mania is the reason for all the Confuse-mania. It's the only thing archers can do against SotW, and you bet your ass they're gonna spam confuse like there's no tomorrow. SotW users brought this upon themselves, quit yer whining about confuse already.

There has been very little focus in this thread about confuse, or very little complaining about it.

The complaining has been about sow users.

As for the suggestion someone made about sow being cancelled by any attack, there should be a sub-forum named 'comedy' for that...

fluffy_muffin · 08-28-2008, 10:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by makarios68

As for the suggestion someone made about sow being cancelled by any attack, there should be a sub-forum named 'comedy' for that...

By any sotw user attack. And btw this is inn :P Small dwarf = small sense of humor?

Jedi-x · 08-28-2008, 11:36 PM

In my post, I made mention to SOtW being cancelled if the SOtW user attacks, not if they themselves get attacked. The spell is meant to resist / evade most all attacks, but it is an evasion / defensive skill, therefore IMHO ........ the user should not be allowed to attack him / herself, otherwise their attack should cancel out the spell.

makarios68 · 08-29-2008, 02:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by zielski

Small dwarf = small sense of humor?

Hey, i made my dwarf large!!!

I'm at least 3cm taller than some other dwarves!!!...

fluffy_muffin · 08-29-2008, 10:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by makarios68

I'm at least 3cm taller than some other dwarves!!!...

In helmet :P

Foggia · 08-29-2008, 11:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jedi-x

In my post, I made mention to SOtW being cancelled if the SOtW user attacks, not if they themselves get attacked. The spell is meant to resist / evade most all attacks, but it is an evasion / defensive skill, therefore IMHO ........ the user should not be allowed to attack him / herself, otherwise their attack should cancel out the spell.

/me agrees. sotw is probably #1 on my hated spells list.

_dracus_ · 08-29-2008, 11:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Piccolo53

/me agrees. sotw is probably #1 on my hated spells list.

For a warlock it's deadly, or at least for my pt warlock it is. For a barbarian I won't say the same

Foggia · 08-29-2008, 11:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gph

For a warlock it's deadly, or at least for my pt warlock it is. For a barbarian I won't say the same

Im a berserker, I can hit strong, but I get hit strong also. When I cant make damage Im usually raped.

padreigh · 08-29-2008, 11:35 AM

Evasion Tree IS NOT a "Use one of this spells and you've forfeit attacking others"-disziple ... so stop trying to tell us archers how to use our skills.

Just in case you didnt notice, archers using SOTW get hit more often since one of the last updates (sideeffect of trying to fix randomgenerator maybe?) so it already GOT nerved. Half the Evasion spells have to be used to be ABLE to fight any other player, why not the toplevel one? For a spell that is THAT expensive it being cancelled after 2 own attacks would be a waste of mana. If youre fighting 5 other ppl and use sotw THEY should be able to kill you after its duration is over. You might take 1 or 2 down, but not all 5. If you face a sotb hunter - kill his pet. If hes a petless hunter 5v1 will take care of him. If its a marksmen - He burned mana he could have used to do damage - rejoice - and let your teammates take care of him. If you got a 1v1 and he wins - shrug it off. Death is cheap and you should be more carefull next time.

(jfye: i use sotb on lvl2 in dire situations and NEVER to start a 1v1).

fluffy_muffin · 08-29-2008, 12:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by padreigh

after its duration is over. You might take 1 or 2 down, but not all 5. If you

So he can take 1-2 ppl out of 5 in 1vs.5 and it is ok. Am i correct? Uhmm. And he can cast it at the end of fight and kill someone who would kill him if he wouldn't have sotw. Am i correct?

I have one more question. If it is so bad spell after last changes then why so many is using it?

08-28-2008, 11:36 PM	#23
Jedi-x Initiate Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Florida USA Posts: 106	In my post, I made mention to SOtW being cancelled if the SOtW *user* attacks, not if they themselves get attacked. The spell is meant to resist / evade most all attacks, but it is an evasion / defensive skill, therefore IMHO ........ the *user* should not be allowed to attack him / herself, otherwise their attack should cancel out the spell. __________________ Jedi-x Hunter lvl 50 , Jedix Warlock lvl 45 , x Jedi x Barb lvl 49 Alsius Hunters of RA

08-29-2008, 11:35 AM	#29
padreigh Master Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Germany, NRW Posts: 270	Evasion Tree IS NOT a "Use one of this spells and you've forfeit attacking others"-disziple ... so stop trying to tell us archers how to use our skills. Just in case you didnt notice, archers using SOTW get hit more often since one of the last updates (sideeffect of trying to fix randomgenerator maybe?) so it already GOT nerved. Half the Evasion spells have to be used to be ABLE to fight any other player, why not the toplevel one? For a spell that is THAT expensive it being cancelled after 2 own attacks would be a waste of mana. If youre fighting 5 other ppl and use sotw THEY should be able to kill you after its duration is over. You might take 1 or 2 down, but not all 5. If you face a sotb hunter - kill his pet. If hes a petless hunter 5v1 will take care of him. If its a marksmen - He burned mana he could have used to do damage - rejoice - and let your teammates take care of him. If you got a 1v1 and he wins - shrug it off. Death is cheap and you should be more carefull next time. (jfye: i use sotb on lvl2 in dire situations and NEVER to start a 1v1). __________________ Running Gag,Amenotil F., Gundar F., Jaspis U., Lance Lost, Tinman of Oz. (H,C,W,M,B,K) Internally processed, nutritioally-drained biological output happens - it's called update