The new warmaster passive skill. - Page 3

NSer · 10-09-2011, 06:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wizardmagewarlock

The idea was great to make WMs better than lvl 60 characters who are not WMs. But the systes is....... :S
Let me count a bit:
-A lvl 60 marksman has at least 100 dexterity. With the new WM skill, they get a bonus of 15 dex. It means that they get 15x1,5 damage = 22,5 DMG (because 1dex gives 1,5 damage).
- What's more, by using Recharged Arrow (which gives 40% damage) 22,5x0,4= 9 DMG
- With Specialist, they get +15%. 22,5*0,15= about 3,5 DMG

Altogether, they get 22,5+9+3,5= 35 extra damage.

This is my thought. I'm sorry if I'm wrong.

Not sorry.... those spells affect only WEAPON damage no attribute

wizardmagewarlock · 10-09-2011, 06:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NSer

Not sorry.... those spells affect only WEAPON damage no attribute

OK, but 22 extra damage is also nice

blood-raven · 10-09-2011, 07:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wizardmagewarlock

- With Specialist, they get +15%. 22,5*0,15= about 3,5 DMG

Le whut?
Get your facts right, specialist gives +10% on 5.
= 2.25 extra dmg
But let's make those numbers more sensational

.
Dirthy fighting: +30% extra dmg
22.5*0.3= 6.75
Dead eye another +30%
=6.75

= +44,25 dmg

_Emin_ · 10-09-2011, 07:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blood-raven

Le whut?
Get your facts right, specialist gives +10% on 5.

a WM Marks won't use it on lv 5, so make it 8%

Psynocide · 10-09-2011, 07:25 PM

Speaking from a knights perspective with knarb leanings I can say I'm enjoying the extra bit of damage and I only have to sacrifice one spell of minor importance in order to reach it.

It's not exactly a game changer nor is it a step backwards.
It is just extra optional content which is always good, no matter how minor.

blood-raven · 10-09-2011, 07:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by _Emin_

a WM Marks won't use it on lv 5, so make it 8%

I was asking me the same question, who puts this on 5?
So yes 8% would be more accurate i guess.

Vroek · 10-09-2011, 07:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NSer

Not sorry.... those spells affect only WEAPON damage no attribute

Read this and stop speculating.

_Enio_ · 10-09-2011, 08:09 PM

How does the WM tree look now after the changes?

_Emin_ · 10-09-2011, 08:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by _Enio_

How does the WM tree look now after the changes?

They only added a lv 17 spell, which gives +15% main attribute.

_Enio_ · 10-09-2011, 09:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by _Emin_

They only added a lv 17 spell, which gives +15% main attribute.

I see, thank you.

10-09-2011, 07:25 PM	#25
Psynocide Master Join Date: May 2007 Location: Here & There Posts: 439	Speaking from a knights perspective with knarb leanings I can say I'm enjoying the extra bit of damage and I only have to sacrifice one spell of minor importance in order to reach it. It's not exactly a game changer nor is it a step backwards. It is just extra optional content which is always good, no matter how minor. __________________ *Psy* Dizzy thumbs, itchy fingers

10-09-2011, 08:09 PM	#28
_Enio_ Marquis Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Germany Posts: 1,843	How does the WM tree look now after the changes? __________________ Fix the Marksman subclass: Suggestion