Save Campers

[Drah]

I was there too.

Of the 10 or so we had there... two people really attacked the save, the rest of us were a little further away at pozo either side of the path (as it was a good vantage point).

We originally went into Pozo to hunt and as is to be expected, we had a steady stream of attacks coming at us from the save. Almost all of us held back apart from one or two idiots who literally went right over to the save.

For most of us Syrtis players that were there, if you'd left the save and headed in any other direction than at us, we wouldn't have attacked.

As for Jibayu and whoever else it was, we WERE screaming and yelling at them to stop... they either don't understand English or just ignored us. When it became evident that they weren't going to leave the save by choice.. the rest of us headed over to Ignis, in the hope that they'd follow and leave the save alone.

---

Originally Posted by makarios68

Denying entry to Pozo? - What a crock of shit.

You could have denied entry to pozo farther away from the save.

Valorius was on top of the hill and so was farther away from the save, near enough in the pozo crater itself... you transferring Jibayu's actions onto Val in order to attack Val is a "crock of shit".

Val was yelling at Jibayu too - even saying that it was damaging the reputation of our realm. I'm sure there are people unconnected to our Clan who were there and can attest to this.

I know Val winds people up and isn't very good with tact and diplomacy but it's Jibayu and the other person who had crossed the line... Val was against them, and was actually on your side of this argument.

[Zidane_Tribal]

Originally Posted by makarios68

I think an area of sanctuary around saves would put a stop to all this nonsense.

no, it wouldnt, it would just mean the campers wait outside that area.

[makarios68]

Originally Posted by Zidane_Tribal

no, it wouldnt, it would just mean the campers wait outside that area.

Why would they wait outside the area? - that would be silly, as they can't kill those at the save.

They would be killed themselves when those at the save call for reinforcements.

At the moment you can be killed as you wait for reinforcements, or be killed when you log in, or be killed when you are bursting for the toilet and have to go afk.

I think santuary makes good sense.

[Witch]

Originally Posted by makarios68

I think santuary makes good sense.

100% agree with makarios68. Let finish with all those noob altar campers.

[e30G]

That can be abused. People being hunted can simply run into the save and automatically be safe.

[makarios68]

Originally Posted by e30ernest

That can be abused. People being hunted can simply run into the save and automatically be safe.

Which is why there would be no point going near enemy saves.

[makarios68]

Originally Posted by Drah

I was there too.

Valorius was on top of the hill and so was farther away from the save, near enough in the pozo crater itself... you transferring Jibayu's actions onto Val in order to attack Val is a "crock of shit".

Val was yelling at Jibayu too - even saying that it was damaging the reputation of our realm. I'm sure there are people unconnected to our Clan who were there and can attest to this.

I know Val winds people up and isn't very good with tact and diplomacy but it's Jibayu and the other person who had crossed the line... Val was against them, and was actually on your side of this argument.

Oh ok - if this is true, apologies to the Valster.

[amade]

I have to agree with magnet's post elsewhere, there shouldn't be safezones people can go to in the warzone. Getting out of a safezone, i.e. permanent res dizzy that gets cancelled as soon as you move, I don't mind.

Val concerned about damaging his realm's reputation? Hmmm, I am impressed.

[Smiley2k7]

Why does it have to be from our realm and doesn't speak English?

[Inkster]

to quote Drah

I was there too.

Of the 10 or so we had there...

well in sight of a save ... enough said