Improve Hunters

[misaccc]

Originally Posted by Katiechan

Why? Because all other classes just stand and hit, often using very little tactics aside from when to cast your dizzy or knock down spells, or when to use AoO or Soulkeeper. Hunter requires so much more than that to stay alive(even if people think that they don't, they really do), and this is exactly how NGD meant for it to be.

ok lol!
this i just had to point out....hunters are one of the easiest classes to play 1on1(open field)...i mean cmon...when i played a lvl46 hunter for the first time in the war zone i killed a lvl50 knight and a barb....im guessing conjus would be easy ass hell with tricks(didnt use them tho)...and when i got pwned by a lvl50 lock i just sotw and camo behind a rock...That was my first time i played a hunter and i killed 2 lvl50 warriors!dude....

[makarios68]

Originally Posted by misaccc

ok lol!
this i just had to point out....hunters are one of the easiest classes to play 1on1(open field)...i mean cmon...when i played a lvl46 hunter for the first time in the war zone i killed a lvl50 knight and a barb....im guessing conjus would be easy ass hell with tricks(didnt use them tho)...and when i got pwned by a lvl50 lock i just sotw and camo behind a rock...That was my first time i played a hunter and i killed 2 lvl50 warriors!dude....

This doesn't mean that hunter is a stronger class - just that the people u fought didn't know how to fight hunters.

Use that hunter again and go find someome like Inkster or Znurre- see how strong you feel with hunter then...

[Angelwinged_Devil]

Originally Posted by makarios68

This doesn't mean that hunter is a stronger class - just that the people u fought didn't know how to fight hunters.

Use that hunter again and go find someome like Inkster or Znurre- see how strong you feel with hunter then...

he played with a hunter for the first time and won?

[Comp]

Originally Posted by Angelwinged_Devil

he played with a hunter for the first time and won?

There are many who are lvl 50 that I could probably beat with a lvl 10 hunter But seriously, just because your lvl 50 doesn't make you uber.

[misaccc]

Originally Posted by makarios68

This doesn't mean that hunter is a stronger class - just that the people u fought didn't know how to fight hunters.

Use that hunter again and go find someome like Inkster - see how strong you feel with hunter then...

i just had to comment about tari's post where he said hunters require much skill to be played...my point they can quite easily kill both melee classes when a pt like me can kill 2 lvl50 warriors...its not about who knows how to fight who when you cant catch the enemy...what should i do play dead?

Originally Posted by makarios68

This doesn't mean that hunter is a stronger class - just that the people u fought didn't know how to fight hunters.

I agree with that... the "no mana, no win" fact takes even more sense when we speak about hunters...

As a lock, if they do the big error to not confuse you meteor/silence + Mana burn + energy borrow + darkness is already a pain in hunters' ass because they can't run away. Indeed all of that is theory, but i've experienced that case yesterday and today with 4 lvl 50 hunters + pets.

Killing them with lvl 4 warlock spells and 14 levels less than them shows who are overpowered...

[makarios68]

Originally Posted by Angelwinged_Devil

he played with a hunter for the first time and won?

Means nothing - first fight with my barb against a same lvl hunter i won...

We can all name instances when this or that happened - it proves nothing in the main...

[trulyem]

This means that you need to be so fucking damn good to beat a hunter and noob tactics to beat other classes?

So it means I play a barb and cannot beat a hunter despite of evades, resists and lag, it means I am uber dumb and stupid that my IQ is below negative

Get real.

[makarios68]

Originally Posted by trulyem

This means that you need to be so fucking damn good to beat a hunter and noob tactics to beat other classes?

So it means I play a barb and cannot beat a hunter despite of evades, resists and lag, it means I am uber dumb and stupid that my IQ is below negative

Get real.

I wasn't sure if this was worth replying to - more of a rant than an argument - as usual..

Anyway, my point is simply that hunters can be beat - you just have to learn how.

As a hunter, i used to have problems against warlocks - i couldn't beat them. But i learned how and now i win most times.

And what you say about not being able to beat hunters because of lag: do you lag worse with hunters more than other classes?

I think not...

This just goes to show how desperate the 'hunters are overpowered' brigade are to try and convince you of their cause.

Barbs can't win hunters beacuse of lag - ha ha!!....

And talking of resists - my healer at lvl 42 resists a lot more than my hunter...

[bigjim]

A barb can easily and I mean easily kill a hunter one on one if they know what they are doing. This hunter hype is starting to make me sick.