MoD in Terror in a PvP

[magnet]

MoD isn't valid for a PvP (game tradition and all that) except against a SotW user (only way to protect). Anyway, Archers weren't overpowered at the time PvP rules were meant.

Terror is valid but very lame. This is not the proper way to win a PvP, whatever the class, except Hunter with pet (because here at least you are trying to knock down the pet too).

I'm talking about PvP as in "arranged pvp" AND "spontaneous pvp" when there are two players, alone and both full hp/mana.

Both are war spells.

Btw all this talk about "MoD is valid for PvP" was also in the Spanish Inn (where I guess Necro get his poll ideas) and it's really shameful to see so many people condoning winning at all cost rather than fighting with honor and winning using skills. And also many lv 50 warlocks who don't even know or understand about the rule... pts.

Btw, MoD when you outnumber your enemy greatly (like 10+vs4-5) is lame too (special mention to some people here).

[LuthienNenharma]

Originally Posted by misaccc

Jajajajaja i killed luthi when she used mod;D

Yea, years ago.
We can try it again one day, just reach lvl 50.

Originally Posted by magnet

MoD isn't valid for a PvP

Against people like you i know i won't have to use them because you won't, but unfortunatly this implicit rule seems to be lost...

On the other hand, there is no honor at war, i want my realm winning at any price (we're the Reds motherfuckers muahaha) This includes the fact that i tank for our warriors on war and using war skill on PvP -.-"

[magnet]

Originally Posted by sathilda

Against people like you i know i won't have to use them because you won't, but unfortunatly this implicit rule seems to be lost...

On the other hand, there is no honor at war, i want my realm winning at any price (we're the Reds motherfuckers muahaha) This includes the fact that i tank for our warriors on war and using war skill on PvP -.-"

Well you can use it against another Warlock on 1vs1 in any situation, but then you've got no right to brag on how you owned him, and he's more than entitled to make it known that you're a noob/pt . A PvP/duel is a real confrontation of skills, the goal is to win by being better than his opponent not using skills that ensure victory.

I know it's hard these days with 85% high level warlocks being noobs, half players being archers (more than half of them hunters), and tons of barbs with a few knights and the overpowered deflective barrier.

On the subject of "evil reds", it's totally normal that you use war spells at war. The sad part is that Ignis has now become like Syrtis and only (or 90% of the time) wins through numbers rather than teamplay.

[DkySven]

Ok, in the arena and in an arranged PvP it is very lame. But I agree with Sathilda, why shouldn't warlocks use all the spells they have while other classes do? (*cough*SotW)

[Froste]

Both are valid... Just extremely lame.

[Envy]

Originally Posted by asdfghs

Ok, in the arena and in an arranged PvP it is very lame. But I agree with Sathilda, why shouldn't warlocks use all the spells they have while other classes do? (*cough*SotW)

What are you talking about? Archers get bitched at an equal amount when they use SotW in a duel, so your point is moot. Besides, under MoD, there'd be no SotW

And it's much easier to dance around a SotW'er that wont be casting offense spells for 20 secs then it is to minimise the dmg of 1 minute of a warlock's full arsenal while you can't cast anything.

[ementh]

Use anything you have....I know I will

[Arkenion]

Originally Posted by misaccc

Jajajajaja i killed luthi when she used mod;D

I didn't ;(

[_dracus_]

Originally Posted by kraetyz

Lame. =(

Why, can you explain me why it's lame to continue attacking a lock under MoD ? ?