"Devastated" state details - Page 4

Llayne · 07-02-2011, 02:54 AM

This '70%' resistance is bs. They changed the base rate and didn't tell anyone. I know I am not the only barb experiencing a new UM that fails much more than it did before the update. I am not really complaining per se, but it would be nice if they let us in on these things. If it is going to be as fail as I have been seeing it would be nice to bump it to 15 seconds. That is what sotw and Ao1 are, yes?

edit: kind of off topic by meh

animalartist · 07-04-2011, 01:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bois

I am rather enjoying this update.

x 2

No more chasing after a tele happy warmaster to keep up with zerg

Open field fighting again and seeing people assembling at bridges - fantastic!
I could be wrong but i seem to see more 3 way fort fights in non devestated zones? (instead of attacking empty forts)

*although totally given up on nobles now

pauluzz · 07-04-2011, 02:29 PM

I like the update, the warmaster 'nerf' was a good thing. lots of fun fights now.
i would love to see some new WM spell tho, who makes it worth to actualy become a warmaster again.. 70% resist? i dont realy mind, i've even seen beacon + UM fail :P

i think the devestated state of a realm is not totaly ok yet.. its more or less the invulnerability again, but now you can take the forts. it solved the market camping tho. but i think ''realm cannot be invaded'' is enough for a devestated realm.
last few days in high times, the game dies down totaly.(from a syrtis point of vieuw) Ignis camps shaan, Alsius camps samal and syrtis at meni. everywhere you go you die because of overcamped forts or you dont get RP because Alsius is devestated.. so everyone kinda afk's. that should be fixed somehow..

and maybe there should be some change in altar system again.. but overall, i think its a good update

HunterRed · 07-06-2011, 11:41 AM

Yea...some things with that Devastated state aren`t fair...It`s like u are punishing other realms `couse 1 is Devastated - no rp, no exp, no Path of the wm...imo, this rules should only be applied to the relam that`s Devastated, not for all 3 relams!

07-02-2011, 02:54 AM	#31
Llayne Initiate Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 205	This '70%' resistance is bs. They changed the base rate and didn't tell anyone. I know I am not the only barb experiencing a new UM that fails much more than it did before the update. I am not really complaining per se, but it would be nice if they let us in on these things. If it is going to be as fail as I have been seeing it would be nice to bump it to 15 seconds. That is what sotw and Ao1 are, yes? edit: kind of off topic by meh

07-04-2011, 02:29 PM	#33
pauluzz Initiate Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: The Netherlands Posts: 178	I like the update, the warmaster 'nerf' was a good thing. lots of fun fights now. i would love to see some new WM spell tho, who makes it worth to actualy become a warmaster again.. 70% resist? i dont realy mind, i've even seen beacon + UM fail :P i think the devestated state of a realm is not totaly ok yet.. its more or less the invulnerability again, but now you can take the forts. it solved the market camping tho. but i think ''realm cannot be invaded'' is enough for a devestated realm. last few days in high times, the game dies down totaly.(from a syrtis point of vieuw) Ignis camps shaan, Alsius camps samal and syrtis at meni. everywhere you go you die because of overcamped forts or you dont get RP because Alsius is devestated.. so everyone kinda afk's. that should be fixed somehow.. and maybe there should be some change in altar system again.. but overall, i think its a good update

07-06-2011, 11:41 AM	#34
HunterRed Pledge Join Date: Jun 2011 Posts: 19	Yea...some things with that Devastated state aren`t fair...It`s like u are punishing other realms `couse 1 is Devastated - no rp, no exp, no Path of the wm...imo, this rules should only be applied to the relam that`s Devastated, not for all 3 relams!