09-11-2012, 04:16 PM | #31 | |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: C4NN!B4L & quod licet iovi - non licet bovi
Posts: 143
|
Quote:
Out of here again. I already know all aspects and arguments about this whole topic from the german forum where nothing was changed by gamigo. So it'll be very interesting for me to see the development of the two different publishers and their communitys. Hope GameSamba did right with this list. I really think so ! Last edited by erttzzadfk; 09-11-2012 at 05:16 PM. |
|
09-11-2012, 05:19 PM | #32 | |
Master
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 395
|
Quote:
__________________
Blue Angel lvl 60 lock,Red Devil lvl 52 conjurer, The-End lvl 60 barb,The End lvl 60 marks ,Sir Doran- Knight |
|
09-11-2012, 05:21 PM | #33 |
Baron
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Hopstad
Posts: 775
|
__________________
Skallagrimr |
09-11-2012, 05:27 PM | #34 |
Master
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Belgium
Posts: 561
|
If you ban someone for cheating i'm fine with it but a public crucifixion is a thing of a dark past.
It's disturbing you think it's a good idea.
__________________
SHAKE IT LIKE A POLAR BEAR NINJA |
09-11-2012, 05:45 PM | #35 |
Baron
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 747
|
I can see both sides. Firstly I'd like to be clear - adding trolls, purple fever carriers, spammers, and harassers is a bit silly and accomplishes nothing. However I can get on board with making it public when people abuse bugs and such to gain war/pvp advantages.
These people cheat to gain an advantage, to gain RP or to win. We can't take away the actual victories or place on the high scores list they've gained by cheating, but we can make sure everyone knows how they got them. Not that the rankings truly matter, but I think if I were competitive enough to care (we do have players who are), and the guys above me in rankings had cheated to get there, I should know about it. When you cheat to gain items, we take the items away. When you cheat to gain victories, we should take those away too. |
09-11-2012, 06:16 PM | #36 | |
Master
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Wonderland
Posts: 308
|
Quote:
a good way to do that is implementing alot of rules, and publishing a hall of shame on forums i'd like to add that daar's post is a bit ironic, because he is basically crying that gamesamba has too many rules that wouldnt exist if they hadnt come place them, and saying how they arent needed but in Raven, he was one of the many that persued the way of the witchhunt, always recording people and trying to get them banned by making up idiotic excuses and showing vid to gm or putting on youtube, such as "save guard glitching" or "precise block animation bug abusing" those were my favourite ones, and if i recall you were banned for at least a day for trolling, the amount of personal attacks was too damn high but you held on to gameamba tightly always crying to a gm My question doesnt need to be answered but if you wanna answer, why the sudden change in behaviour? all of a sudden there are too many rules? |
|
09-11-2012, 06:21 PM | #37 |
Master
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Belgium
Posts: 561
|
__________________
SHAKE IT LIKE A POLAR BEAR NINJA |
09-11-2012, 06:28 PM | #38 |
Baron
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 747
|
|
09-11-2012, 06:43 PM | #39 |
Master
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Wonderland
Posts: 308
|
nop not sarcastic at all
|
09-11-2012, 06:51 PM | #40 |
Initiate
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Sweden
Posts: 163
|
This matter is just another perfect example off Gamesamba having their own
rules and NGD has theirs. On this forum we are not allowed to name cheaters or hang out troublemakers ( and i think that is a good thing) instead we are supposed to report it. But heck on Gamesamba forum the GM´s themself put out the names... Really can anyone from ngd make a statement if you are working on a common ruleset or we just need to live in limbo and hope we dont brake any off gamesambas wierd rules and get banned? Like the insta ban for savecamping, what is considerd camping and not in the eyes off gamesamba? Will i get banned for passing the save and i defend myself from an attacker that stands at save or is that ok (castle saves at this example), or is it up to the GM on duty if he is in a good or bad mood to decide? From what ive seen and heard the GM´s interprets the rules based on their own personal opinion and what mood they are in. And it often feels like they really dont know either and just act on what they belive is correct or not.... Really, this is getting retarded.
__________________
Beardo-Knight / Fautor-Conju / Fury-Warlock Brutus-Barbar / Furon-Hunter / The Dude-Marks Alsius [Haven] |
|
|