Sytris save campers - why you ? - Page 5

magnet · 12-02-2007, 01:49 PM

Every spell has a counterspell. What fun would it be if they were NOT trackable?

Btw, this discussion happened a few months ago already... and the conclusion was: it's not going to change.

misaccc · 12-02-2007, 01:55 PM

Yup stalker&camou r good as they r now
btw great change of subject lol

tak · 12-02-2007, 01:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by One

Think in other way : what's the point to use camouflage or stalker if you're trackable?

You claim to play a hunter for months and know dick about their skills?

The things you demand are just ludicrous, remove Stalker and Camouflage

and you haven't even figured out they can be tracked.

Go back and play some more maybe you'll find something sensible to ask for.

One · 12-02-2007, 02:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tak

You claim to play a hunter for months and know dick about their skills?

The things you demand are just ludicrous, remove Stalker and Camouflage

and you haven't even figured out they can be tracked.

Go back and play some more maybe you'll find something sensible to ask for.

If you read up I said that i cannot track camou and stalker and I'm sure that I'm not alone. How many times I see enemy with my eyes and track say "no tracks"? I cannot track visible enemy many times so how could I track invisible? Good question. I know what I've saw and many of you exploiting that bug like DMC i hunted him few times and every time he used camouflage i checked spell track and always was "no tracks".

Myxir · 12-02-2007, 02:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by One

If you read up I said that i cannot track camou and stalker and I'm sure that I'm not alone. How many times I see enemy with my eyes and track say "no tracks"? I cannot track visible enemy many times so how could I track invisible?

You cannot track visible persons if:
1. There are trees in the way
2. Stones in the way (the small ones are enough to block it)
3. he stands on the other side of the bridge
4. you don't track him if there is another group that is further

This should be for invisibles too, i guess.

misaccc · 12-02-2007, 02:21 PM

It happed a some time ago that us few mid lvls went to pb and our hunter tracked and said that theres nothing.we went to bridge and there were like 20 syrtis lol
so thats a bug right?

tak · 12-02-2007, 02:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by One

If you read up I said that i cannot track camou and stalker and I'm sure that I'm not alone. How many times I see enemy with my eyes and track say "no tracks"? I cannot track visible enemy many times so how could I track invisible? Good question. I know what I've saw and many of you exploiting that bug like DMC i hunted him few times and every time he used camouflage i checked spell track and always was "no tracks".

I can track camouflaged hunters. Nessa told you he can as well. Noone said yet that he can't either. Plus the things that Nessa told you about trees and stones etc. still apply. If you don't know about bugs of your skills be ready to learn about them at least.

Calling for those skills to be removed instead just makes you look ridiculous, which was the main reason i replied to your post.

tak · 12-02-2007, 02:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by misaccc

It happed a some time ago that us few mid lvls went to pb and our hunter tracked and said that theres nothing.we went to bridge and there were like 20 syrtis lol
so thats a bug right?

Yeah, bridge area is buggy as hell. I remember fighting Syrtis on pb, casting MoD and no one getting dizzy.
Area spells have to be used with caution when around or on bridges.

makarios68 · 12-02-2007, 02:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by misaccc

It happed a some time ago that us few mid lvls went to pb and our hunter tracked and said that theres nothing.we went to bridge and there were like 20 syrtis lol
so thats a bug right?

I think it's designed that way - certain features like bridges, forts and rocks are designed to make hunter scans fallible. I suppose the thinking is that if their scans were correct 100% it would be less fair and less fun.

So next time a hunter says, "nada" - i suggest you remain wary.

makarios68 · 12-02-2007, 02:30 PM

And don't blame the hunter if he says, "nada" and there's 20 enemies nearby.

He is merely repeating what he reads on his log.

And to those people who say, "You said there was nothing!" =

12-02-2007, 01:49 PM	#41
magnet Count Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: France Posts: 1,416	Every spell has a counterspell. What fun would it be if they were NOT trackable? Btw, this discussion happened a few months ago already... and the conclusion was: it's not going to change. __________________

12-02-2007, 01:55 PM	#42
misaccc Banned Join Date: May 2007 Location: Belgrade!!! Posts: 1,807	Yup stalker&camou r good as they r now btw great change of subject lol

12-02-2007, 02:21 PM	#46
misaccc Banned Join Date: May 2007 Location: Belgrade!!! Posts: 1,807	It happed a some time ago that us few mid lvls went to pb and our hunter tracked and said that theres nothing.we went to bridge and there were like 20 syrtis lol so thats a bug right?

12-02-2007, 02:30 PM	#50
makarios68 Count Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: England Posts: 1,300	And don't blame the hunter if he says, "nada" and there's 20 enemies nearby. He is merely repeating what he reads on his log. And to those people who say, "You said there was nothing!" =