Why classes become overpowered - Page 5

ncvr · 04-09-2008, 12:13 PM

Yes, that's a good idea. As it is now Vanguard has very few useful spells.

Signatus · 04-09-2008, 12:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by magnet

No no, there is a reduction for slashing in piercing lv 15.

Just because I make posts on beginners thread that doesn't mean I am THAT newb...

Quote:

Originally Posted by magnet

Are you talking about an active buff (like Shields Wall or Deflecting Arrows?). In that case, yes there should be one.

Yes, that was what I meant...

Quote:

Originally Posted by magnet

But what I'm saying is that I think there should be a passive like Acrobatic in Vanguard, 30% resist *all* damage at level 5. With the other passive resists, a Knight could get up to 50% resist for some damage types (but not all).

Er... that.would.be.overpowering... but don't tell anyone because I like the idea.

magnet · 04-09-2008, 12:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Signatus

Er... that.would.be.overpowering... but don't tell anyone because I like the idea.

Barbs have Frenzy which is permanent 20% resist physical, so actually they have a better defense than Knights. It would simply put Knights back in the track

e30G · 04-09-2008, 12:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by magnet

It was like that before and it was just fine -- for Warlocks as well as for everyone. My Knight suffers from evades just as much as the Warlock because I have to immobilize/knock down my opponents if I want to kill them. I need spells to go in.

No its not the same because if you read my initial post, it was my reply to AWD wanting to remove all chance spells and remove evades and resists from the game. If you do that you will have many balance issues. Warlocks and Marksmen will truly be overpowered then.

magnet · 04-09-2008, 12:48 PM

You can't remove it 100%, but you can have it back to old and decent levels.

ncvr · 04-09-2008, 12:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by magnet

You can't remove it 100%, but you can have it back to old and decent levels.

Yes, it was good back then...

e30G · 04-09-2008, 01:10 PM

To that I will agree.

fluffy_muffin · 04-09-2008, 01:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by magnet

As I already stated, Confuse would be OK if it hard Meteor's or Silence duration (even a bit longer actually). But of course you know that and omitted it because you're fundamentally dishonest. Nothing new under the sun.

And you still compare confuse with real dizzy spells. Nothing new.
Give me something like warlock's darkness. Than you can take confuse away, or real dizzy spell.

magnet · 04-09-2008, 01:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by zielski

And you still compare confuse with real dizzy spells. Nothing new.
Give me something like warlock's darness. Than you can take confuse away, or reall dizzy spell.

1) No, read your post again. YOU compared confuse and dizzy; and that's what I was replying to. I'm sick of your 2cents rhetoric.

2) Darkness has cooldown 120, range 20, casting time 2s. I am all for keeping Confuse as it is, if it has the same cooldown, range and casting time as Darkness, as those spells are indeed quite similar.

ncvr · 04-09-2008, 01:22 PM

Yes, real dizzy spell would be fine.

04-09-2008, 12:48 PM	#45
magnet Count Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: France Posts: 1,416	You can't remove it 100%, but you can have it back to old and decent levels. __________________

04-09-2008, 01:10 PM	#47
e30G Count Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Philippines Posts: 1,244	To that I will agree. __________________ I N Q U I S I T I O N On Regnum Sabbatical

04-09-2008, 12:13 PM	#41
ncvr Marquis Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Australia Posts: 2,439	Yes, that's a good idea. As it is now Vanguard has very few useful spells.

04-09-2008, 01:22 PM	#50
ncvr Marquis Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Australia Posts: 2,439	Yes, real dizzy spell would be fine.