|
|
General discussion Topics related to various aspects of Champions of Regnum |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
06-10-2008, 03:29 PM | #51 | |
Banned
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 178
|
Quote:
Even 35 is just too short except for conjurers. Any of you can say anything you want, but a game with 271.314 subscribers today and only 1000 active players, there is really something wrong and you all know what is wrong. The biggest problem is also cheats, which is not implemented anti cheat system. When a Ignis hunter cast 3x SOTW in 2 minutes you can't say that the game is clean . Oh of course I cannot prove that, but I have nothing to prove neither. |
|
06-10-2008, 03:49 PM | #52 | |||||
Count
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: France
Posts: 1,416
|
Quote:
When it comes to players, only stats matters and a lv 37 *can* kill a lv 50, it doesn't mean it will be easy or even possible... the lv 50 has to play very badly and the lv 37 very good. But it is possible. A lv 37 warlock can definitely kill a lv 50 Warlock. I've done it, I've seen it. With my lv 40 Barb I killed a lv 50 "impossible" Hunter too... You just need to play better, but it has nothing to do with mobs where how well you play doesn't mean anything since the resistance is artificial. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
|
|||||
06-10-2008, 05:58 PM | #53 | |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 890
|
Quote:
A lvl 40 player killing a lvl45 means nothing compared to a lvl 45 killing a lvl 50 assuming they are the same class. Why would the lvl 40 player be rewarded the same for that? The system reward you in measure with the 'threat' you eliminate you don't get rewarded with 18 rp for killing another lvl 30 player because he is not a big threat, good for you but none cares! Besides all this there are class differences almost nullifying the difficulty levels, hence it makes more sense to also be based on the potential threat instead of just basing it on your so called accomplishment. |
|
06-10-2008, 06:22 PM | #54 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Łódż, Poland
Posts: 1,506
|
Someone should post how many RP you recieve from an opponent depending on level. Last I checked I was worth 16 RP? And im level 44.
|
06-10-2008, 11:56 PM | #55 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
They can't understand this : it's just a matter of discipline points (mainly for mages) and weapons (archers/warriors)... lvl 45 vs lvl 46+ at the same class is probably the most unfair fight you can have. |
|
06-11-2008, 12:23 AM | #56 | ||
Baron
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 702
|
Quote:
hmm, but Vroek said the difference between 45 and 50 is quite small, didn't he? Quote:
But however, I see your point Vroek: You are right when you say you eleminate a bigger threat by killing a lvl 50 than a lvl 49. But you as lvl 49 player have to fight against another lvl 49 player as hard as a lvl 50 vs lvl 50. But the lvl 49 is not that much rewarded. But we talk about realm points (Or are they called regnum points?) and for this you are right, you did more for your realm by killing lvl 50 than lvl 49. I did not thought about this.
__________________
dwarfen sniper pts Cumeri Tarenes and Hunti |
||
06-11-2008, 11:23 AM | #57 | |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 890
|
Quote:
Example: You can easily make lvl 45 warlock setup that will enable you to compete fairly with almost all lvl 50 warlocks but then you might suffer while fighting warriors. A lvl 45 barbarian can easily make setup that allow him to kill a lvl 50 barb in 3 hits. Add to this the fact that RO is mostly about numbers and group balance/tactics. In this case each class have wide range of useful spells that have the same effect no matter what level you are. |
|
|
|