Sytris save campers - why you ? - Page 7

Valorius · 12-04-2007, 07:54 PM

Apparently not.

NightTwix · 12-04-2007, 08:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Valorius

Apparently not.

Apparently you didnt read through the thread

Valorius · 12-05-2007, 11:30 AM

The fact that people are still commenting on it, means that apparently its not settled. The fact that more threads just like this one will be posted in the days and weeks to come, is further evidence its not settled.

I will post on whatever open thread i feel like. If you dont like it, dont read my posts.

LOL, hater.

Myxir · 12-05-2007, 12:52 PM

#54 on the last page was the last post related to the Spell bugs. After this we returned to the original topic

MAXDDARK · 12-05-2007, 02:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Valorius

Hmm, i was there as we took out large parties of alsius and ignis at our save market yesterday. And we do it almost every day, for that matter.

I think that whining about save camping is hypocritical, cause every realm does it. A lot.

Also, it is INTENTIONALLY an open combat freefire warzone. If you dont like save campers, dont go in the WZ.

In Alsius i get the impression they consider all of pozo to be part of their save, cause ive seen several screenies of syrtis in the opening of pozo, being accused of save camping. And seriously, if you dont want us in your save....why do you always run back to it when attacked? Because it's smart, yes....but it does encourage "save camping", doesnt it?

I consider save camping only if you begin fighting in the save, OR shoot at the enemy that currently inside the save zone.
But if you were fighting outside the save and he run to the save I think it would be fair to finish him off.

But certainly not to wait just outside the save (or inside the save) for people to respawn and kill them when the "god mode" time goes off.

Kill people near the big hole zone in Alsius is fair , and market camping as not very nice

is also legit.

Valorius · 12-05-2007, 04:49 PM

I have no issues with someone shooting an afk player who is lounging around in save thinking he's safe. Going AFK in wz is stupid, and should always be punished by death. LOL.

If they're not afk, then they'll fight back, so where we are doesnt really even matter. If anything, attacking an enemy in save gives him many advantadges over you that he would not normally have.

chuckclose1 · 12-06-2007, 06:18 AM

i agree , i go afk in th wz all the time for what ever reason

and i usally expect to be dead by the time i get back

whats the big deal i kill a mob and get rid of the necro

daflear · 12-06-2007, 09:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Valorius

I have no issues with someone shooting an afk player who is lounging around in save thinking he's safe. Going AFK in wz is stupid, and should always be punished by death. LOL.

If they're not afk, then they'll fight back, so where we are doesnt really even matter. If anything, attacking an enemy in save gives him many advantadges over you that he would not normally have.

Right, the most funniest guys are the people, who go afk at the gate IN the warzone

No mercy for this ;-)

12-05-2007, 12:52 PM	#64
Myxir Count Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Germany Posts: 1,164	#54 on the last page was the last post related to the Spell bugs. After this we returned to the original topic __________________ French Warriors of Syrtis: Nessa Telrunya (Hunter) - Myxir (Warlock) - Estra (Conjurer) In War it does not matter who is right, but who is left.

12-06-2007, 06:18 AM	#67
chuckclose1 Master Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: baltimore MD. United States Posts: 369	i agree , i go afk in th wz all the time for what ever reason and i usally expect to be dead by the time i get back whats the big deal i kill a mob and get rid of the necro __________________ CRYTOPS Kritipz Flame of Vahalla UTGHAR Warlock lvl 44 NORDO LVL5 ARCHER= SUPER NOOB

12-04-2007, 07:54 PM	#61
Valorius Banned Join Date: Jul 2007 Posts: 1,994	Apparently not.

12-05-2007, 11:30 AM	#63
Valorius Banned Join Date: Jul 2007 Posts: 1,994	The fact that people are still commenting on it, means that apparently its not settled. The fact that more threads just like this one will be posted in the days and weeks to come, is further evidence its not settled. I will post on whatever open thread i feel like. If you dont like it, dont read my posts. LOL, hater.

12-05-2007, 04:49 PM	#66
Valorius Banned Join Date: Jul 2007 Posts: 1,994	I have no issues with someone shooting an afk player who is lounging around in save thinking he's safe. Going AFK in wz is stupid, and should always be punished by death. LOL. If they're not afk, then they'll fight back, so where we are doesnt really even matter. If anything, attacking an enemy in save gives him many advantadges over you that he would not normally have.