Clarification on relics, invasions and such - Page 2

LucianDeathshield · 01-16-2013, 08:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shwish

To be honest, I find it ridiculous that you are able to move a relic on a mount irrespective of whether its allowed or not. It would be nice if we could have some kind of explanation as to why it is the way it is?

Probably forcing people to buy mounts

bois · 01-16-2013, 01:42 PM

Mm I don't think that "the customer is always right" is really NGD's policy. In fact the opposite may be true. As for the culture of the company, for a long time the communication culture has been poor.
Based on evidence over 4+ years I don't expect that to change. It is simply too entrenched from the top brass.
However , if I intend to continue to keep playing the game, I will have to wade through the mire to pan for the nuggets of useful information.

This is the purpose of my thread here.
What I am hoping to find is a collection of bits and pieces that I can paste together to actually get a perspective of the whole update.

After I get that, I may actually be able to comment on this update.

01-16-2013, 01:42 PM	#12
bois Count Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Trinidad and Tobago Posts: 1,194	Mm I don't think that "the customer is always right" is really NGD's policy. In fact the opposite may be true. As for the culture of the company, for a long time the communication culture has been poor. Based on evidence over 4+ years I don't expect that to change. It is simply too entrenched from the top brass. However , if I intend to continue to keep playing the game, I will have to wade through the mire to pan for the nuggets of useful information. This is the purpose of my thread here. What I am hoping to find is a collection of bits and pieces that I can paste together to actually get a perspective of the whole update. After I get that, I may actually be able to comment on this update.