DI and MS

[Aely]

It's nice to want to remove DI but for those who use support, such as conjus for other conju, is the exhibit has even more spells as confuse. Basically, the Conju no longer has to wait an eternity to see either his teammate die or even be dying, without providing nothing, if DI is removed, should be removed other spells ...

[MDpro]

New ranged damage reduction on Sprint is too much, this should be (again) removed, or at least decreased (30% is too much, when barbs already have -20% physical on Frenzy).

Agreed.


I think MS and DI should be like this:

DI duration by level: (1) 12s, (2) 18s, (3) 25s, (4) 32s, (5) 40s. (mana costs and CD all remain as they currently are). Seems fair, right? I don't skill DI any higher than 3 because I think 40s is just right at max for that spell. 80s is too long, and now that I play conj, I realize that 20s or so for level 5 is too short.

MS: Dispel ally buffs, chance per level stays the same, dmg and cooldown stays the same, raise mana costs a little bit.

[schachteana]

stupid poll, try again

Removed? No. Reworked? Yes.

this.

here's my usual suggestions:

UM: disable DI temporarily
MS: remove foreign buffs ONLY

other tweaks to DI: maybe

[Iheartpancakes]

Originally Posted by schachteana

UM: disable DI temporarily
MS: remove foreign buffs ONLY

These sound decent, especially MS removing only foreign buffs. +100

[Svarec]

Originally Posted by schachteana

stupid poll, try again


this.

here's my usual suggestions:

UM: disable DI temporarily
MS: remove foreign buffs ONLY

other tweaks to DI: maybe

In that combination it can work but still thinking it is not needed, there are really larger problems than this. You can debate about all other spells and find many opinions and many suggestion and there are already many suggestion on forum that are better than remove MS and DI. Really dont understand why somebody opens that topic over and over again.