|
|
The Inn A place to gather around and chat about almost any subject |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1 | |
Banned
![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 440
![]() |
![]()
Im sure alot of people have heard of this song recently (personally i like the original version by Jeff Buckley), but im more interested in the lyrics.
Quote:
P.s i posted the lyrics becos..they just nudged something in my head, dont ask me why..lol |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Initiate
![]() ![]() Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Sweden
Posts: 231
![]() |
![]() Quote:
With this post, I don't want to be a besserwisser, I just simply wanted to say that Jeff is a great artist, and that I adore his work.
__________________
Ulmanyar
Flame of Valhalla Alsius - a few, but we got goats! BAAAAH! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Count
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Infinite Improbability Drive
Posts: 1,287
![]() |
![]()
It's a Leonard Cohen song, as Ulma pointed out. Also, there is a verse that Buckley usually leaves out, and Cohen does sometimes too, because of it's sexual content. If you search it a bit you might find a live performance with the complete lyrics.
PS: Oh wait I think the one you posted includes that verse ![]()
__________________
Hit me, nail me, make me God. Panoramix :: Half Elf Hunter ## Miraculix :: Half Elf Marksman ## Aspirinix :: Wood Elf Conjurer Syrtis :: Horus :: Antartes |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Initiate
![]() ![]() Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 144
![]() |
![]()
Some of the most intense religious/philosophical books i've read are Leo Tolstoj's works, "The Kingdom of God is within you", "Confessions", "The Gospel in Brief", although most would categorize those more as religious/mystical than philosophical. I read those in parallell with Nietzsche (...Zarathustra) and even though their conclusions are technically diametrically opposed there is also surprisingly much alike between them (maybe because they lived in the same time period).
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | ||
Banned
![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 440
![]() |
![]() Quote:
Quote:
![]() The Nietzche book i have is "Beyond good and Evil", and shamefully im reading it aloud simply because..hmmm well some bits i understand and some i dont. Im interested in philosophy and Nietzsche caught my eye, so could you suggest something that's a bit more palatable to my beginners mind please ? Ill admit im not a believer of God as such (despite the experiences ive had in life that probably contridict this statement), but the whole question of Faith, Religions and Mystical aspects of life are intriguing me but i really dont know where to start, its kind of frustrating. (I wish i had IRC still Enith to thrash these bits that are bugging me lol) |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Banned
![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 440
![]() |
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | ||
Master
![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 281
![]() |
![]() Quote:
The problem with classical philosophers is that they generally came from a world different from the commoner. That is to say, classical philosophers were mostly rich and spent most of their time thinking and writing. As you know this differs from the commoner who spends their entire life working. However, this type of lifestyle allowed these philosophers to achieve extreme ideologies, or pure ideas that seem like the most profound and logical thoughts ever created. Yet they often fail to be transferable outside the realm of ideas (aside from their mathematical discoveries) and that is because humans, by and large, don't live like these individuals did or do, for they were the privileged of their time. This is also another reason why their ideas are so hard to understand, they literately spent years building up their rationalizations by hammering them, and shaping them - creating new words, and analytical styles to to justify, to themselves, the positions they took. Which in the end makes it insane, in my opinion, to even consider their ideas worthy to follow. That is not to say they did not have good ideas, rationalizations, but they are so far removed from human reality (hence ideas) that their application to the real world often fails (again aside from mathematics). But none-the-less I offer this individual as a suggestion: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernard_Williams Quote:
The answer to questions of Faith, Religions and Mystical aspects of life wont be found from classical philosophy (or even modern philosophy). To get these answers one needs to study the theological aspects of a given religion or mystical system in order to understand their significance and then practice them. However, if you are interested in such things I think the best way to study theological aspects is from a perspective that is resembles those that are most known to you. For example, for Christianity I would suggest reading from this individual: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Aquinas Or perhaps Dietrich Bonhoeffer, which some of his ideas can be found here http://www.iep.utm.edu/b/bonhoeff.htm But for Bonhoeffer I would suggest the book: Bonhoeffer's Ethics. I assume that Christianity is something that you are well acquainted with given that you are British (if I remember right). Understanding their basic rationalizations will allow you to decrypt their worldview and will serve as a bases to allow you apply that, how you come to understand their perspective and their short comings, to other religions and mystical systems.
__________________
.'. In the name of God, impure souls of the living dead shall be banished into eternal damnation. Amen. - Alucard .'. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |||
Banned
![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 440
![]() |
![]() Quote:
Quote:
![]() In reality i dont know any people i can ask about stuff like this, kind of hard to explain but most people i know in RL are not really open to ideas or thoughts like this really and if i was(and i have) to mention said thoughts id get the "look" <sighs>. Quote:
![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | ||
Master
![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 281
![]() |
![]() Quote:
The reason why you would get the "look" is because you threaten their sense of the world, whether they are conscious of it or not. Basically by questioning reality you also question their motives, actions and their understanding of the world. In essence you unravel how they make sense of the world and the justifications they use. And to some this is seen as a threat, so much so they they will use violence against you. Also if you go to long, that is questioning reality, and are able to prove your point to where not only individuals feel threatened, but also whole groups of individuals, watch out because then you will face an organized effort to stop you from questioning the reality of things. Because you may actually unhinge the power of such groups. If you think this is just conspiracy nonsense I would urge you to read about any revolutionary movement that has occurred in history and what the power elite in said society did to such people or groups. Such revolutions, whether violent or not, always started with someone, or a group of people that questioned the reality around them. Quote:
First, all humans are rational. Some would tell you that this is what makes the human more advanced then other species, however, other animals also act within a rational too. The true difference between the human animal and other animal species is that humans have the capability for abstract thinking which led humanity to evolve language, writing and mathematics. Aside from this special ability humans are like every other animal. So given this then there is no difference between humans, for you are correct, they are common in that they think rationally. Second, the true distinction between humans is their social-economic status and this difference can have an extreme impact on individuals. For example, who is more likely to come up with ideas that have an impact on society? The individual that toils all day in the field and then comes home to a needy family or the individual who, because of the amount of wealth he has, is able to remove himself from the day-to-day toils of life and set his life to solving the great questions that plague humanity? The commoner is restricted from making changes in society because the commoner has to focus on his work, which has nothing to do with thinking in abstract thoughts, and providing for his family. Yet if he has time left from these tasks he can use what little time he has as for the purpose of questioning reality and come up with a new way to understanding it. Often though such individuals are met with much resistance for the very reasons I noted above. And again if you think this is false I would urge you to look at how rich people imped on the rights of the poor and how rich nations imped upon the political rights of poor nations. That is to say, in each case the rich impact the world more then the poor, and often the poor are fraught with resistance to their ideas. For an example of this I would urge you to read about two situations: (1) the civil rights movement in America, in which Whites suppressed the Rights of Blacks, and (2) the socialist movement in South America during the '70s and what the Western nations thought and did with this movement. Remember, what can be seen happing in the micro (actions between individuals and groups) can also be seen in the macro (actions between nation-states).
__________________
.'. In the name of God, impure souls of the living dead shall be banished into eternal damnation. Amen. - Alucard .'. Last edited by Hell_bound; 01-20-2009 at 01:44 PM. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | ||||
Banned
![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 440
![]() |
![]()
I can see why you have so much to say on this subject, which is all the better for me
![]() Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
P.s Any good books..links you can recommend would be appreciated..ty |
||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|