Balance Update, First real iteration on AMUN!

[UmarilsStillHere]

Originally Posted by Blaa

I'm already experimenting with dropping terror. Why use a spell when you're not entirely sure it will work anyway.

You want to drop terror because of a 10% fail rate on the knockdown? Your kidding right?

Look at all the warriors who use MS knowing its debuff has a 50% fail rate, or all the conjus using dispell/mass dispell regardless of its fail rates in the lower levels (not all can afford to level it to 5) barbs using Um, knights using defensive stance, conjus using mind blank ...

Seriously 90% is a lot, its not a big deal.

As with Lumi my positioning is a mess, landing a hit on a moving player (or even a standing one) is rare for me on Amun.

[Pnarpa]

Originally Posted by Umaril

You want to drop terror because of a 10% fail rate on the knockdown? Your kidding right?

Look at all the warriors who use MS knowing its debuff has a 50% fail rate, or all the conjus using dispell/mass dispell regardless of its fail rates in the lower levels (not all can afford to level it to 5) barbs using Um, knights using defensive stance, conjus using mind blank ...

Seriously 90% is a lot, its not a big deal.

As with Lumi my positioning is a mess, landing a hit on a moving player (or even a standing one) is rare for me on Amun.

I just need to be sure it will work. That's just MY opinion.

Besides, it's rather interesting going without terror. Sometimes it feels like a default setup; "Okay... new setup. First Arcania up to 19 and terror to 5".

[cokolwiek]

since auras gone be fixed (what im personaly happy about)
defence combos shoud be nerfed so Frenzy + Caution and
Acrobatic + Evasive Tactics

[ncvr]

Originally Posted by Blaa

I just need to be sure it will work. That's just MY opinion.

Besides, it's rather interesting going without terror. Sometimes it feels like a default setup; "Okay... new setup. First Arcania up to 19 and terror to 5".

It's a goddamn area. You'd only need a 100% chance if you planned on using it in 1v1.

[BigManOnCampus]

Since Chilko was nice enough to give us all the info on the balance update in this thread, please dont turn it into a "your tactics must suck, you're doing it wrong" thread. I'd rather have this thread remain open, so please ignore the people who say things that sound absurd.

[MalaTempora]

Originally Posted by Blaa

I just need to be sure it will work. That's just MY opinion.

Besides, it's rather interesting going without terror. Sometimes it feels like a default setup; "Okay... new setup. First Arcania up to 19 and terror to 5".

90% is a good measure of "sure" in a game... you have to let some chances
to other...

Kick usually is resisted so much, as ms(5) and feint and south cross and any
other..

really.. 90% is a real good chances

[Pnarpa]

Euh... I'm sorry I expressed my opinion?

[MalaTempora]

Originally Posted by Blaa

Euh... I'm sorry I expressed my opinion?

mmm you haven't to be sorry, but probably your opinion (valid like mine.. ) is not so shareable with others that are not warlocks..

appear that ppl who play the most OP classes (hunters and with a real minor minor degrees lock) hardly find themself OP... and try with all their force to
keep the things as is now, this is clear, but honestly can you explain why:
- with my lvl 25 lock i can EASILY KILL LVL 50 MOBS???
- with my lvl 50 knight i have to swet to do it..

[Pnarpa]

I'm actually pro nerfing terror and I know locks are overpowered. But I guess saying you're going to drop a spell, because you don't like chance spells is just weird for people.

[j4np0l]

Originally Posted by Blaa

I'm actually pro nerfing terror and I know locks are overpowered. But I guess saying you're going to drop a spell, because you don't like chance spells is just weird for people.

I think no one is going to drop terror only because of the 90% chance :S

Myabe for PvP, but balance is RvR oriented