|
|
General discussion Topics related to various aspects of Champions of Regnum |
View Poll Results: Like this idea? | |||
YES!!! dang it's perfect marksmen won't be limited! |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
9 | 17.65% |
No we need another way to solve the issue... |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
42 | 82.35% |
Voters: 51. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools
![]() |
Display Modes
![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Marquis
![]() Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Edge of the Abyss
Posts: 2,066
![]() |
![]() Quote:
Shield bash kick backbreaker combo is deadly as is... |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Pledge
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Czech republic
Posts: 23
![]() |
![]()
Actually it's only 25 range. No conjurer would hide if I could confuse in my full range, that would be funny.
![]() Edit: deal! hunters would get a real dizzy for warlocks |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Count
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: England, UK.
Posts: 1,055
![]() ![]() |
![]() Quote:
Spoken truely like someone who does not play a Knight. ![]() Shield bash is extremely hard to use (bugged?) as it takes forever to start casting - far longer than any other; not including its cast time. Just making spells up now are we? ![]() And no, that "combo" it not deadly. This is a knight we're talking about.
__________________
MattdoesJOKE_#40_NOT_FOUND
RA / Hor... Haven? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Baron
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 747
![]() |
![]()
The only ways I've ever seen a knight land shield bash on me was with an immobilize, or an extremely well timed (lucky?) cast following a knock.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Marquis
![]() Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Edge of the Abyss
Posts: 2,066
![]() |
![]() Quote:
All the knight skills should be instant cast that are within weapon range. Backslam = backbreaker to me its all the same... I had a change of heart... if hunters had a true dizzy skill they would be unstoppable.... no attack skills or run away skills.... <delete poll> Last edited by DemonMonger; 01-28-2010 at 01:36 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Banned
![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Poland
Posts: 489
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Apprentice
![]() Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 59
![]() |
![]()
Errr what is the problem with confuse ? It maybe pwns in some way on 1vs1, but this is a RvR game isn it ?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Banned
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 890
![]() |
![]() Quote:
Six hunters wouldnt have much of a chance against six opponents (one of each class). I can almost guarantee that 6 hunters will beat the 'balanced' group 9 times out of 10. It may be that six warjurers or warlocks also would beat six opponents (one of each class). But six warjurers, can not force a confrontation due to other limitations. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Apprentice
![]() Join Date: May 2008
Location: Body in U.S. , mind in Persia
Posts: 50
![]() |
![]()
6 hunters should be able to beat 6 opponents b/c that is 1 vs 1 pvp, what hunters were born for. and wth would u make it marks only, that doesnt make everyone happy, but you would have to read all of these posts to know that...
i mainly do 1 vs 1 pvp in wz on my 50 hunter, and when i go against a 50 marks, whether i have confuse or not (they usually already have some buffs up), the majority of the time, i'll die, from a fast short bow that hits abnormally hard having confuse, in a tree, that most marks have leveled up anyway, would make it an even more spammed spell, all marks would have it though for hunters, we have to get rid of some in pets, evasion, or tracking to make room for confuse; which is done often, but not by all new title: Solution to confuse without nerfs: spamming |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Count
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,186
![]() |
![]()
What is actually improvement there?
Giving to all archers power to dizzy conjurer so he cannot cast anything, instead not just being able to heal? Spell that passes their only defense, DI? I m strongly against this. ![]()
__________________
Inquisition |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|